AI-based prostate volume estimation from multi-planar MRI under variable acquisition protocols.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
- Department of Computer Science, University of Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
- SMIL, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Abstract
Prostate MRI protocols vary across institutions, with abbreviated protocols increasingly limited to axial plane acquisitions. Conventional deep learning (DL) models for prostate volume (PV) estimation typically require complete availability of annotated full imaging protocols during training and inference, limiting their adaptability in real-world clinical workflows. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a knowledge-based (KB) DL segmentation model that adapts to variable MRI acquisition protocols, including axial-only abbreviated protocols. This retrospective study included 629 multiparametric 3-Tesla prostate MRI exams (66.60 ± 7.50 years) from biopsy-confirmed patients. Manual segmentations by expert radiologists and ellipsoid-derived volumes per PI-RADS 2.1 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <msub><mrow><mi>PV</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>ref</mi></mrow> </msub> </math> ) served as reference standards. A 2D nnU-Net-based DL model with a KB contrastive loss was trained using only axial segmentations while incorporating unannotated orthogonal views ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <msub><mrow><mi>PV</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>KB</mi></mrow> </msub> </math> ). Performance was compared to a fully supervised nnU-Net-based DL model trained with full multi-planar annotations and data ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>PV</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>DL</mi></mrow> </msub> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </math> . Evaluation metrics included Dice Score Coefficient (DSC), Relative Volume Difference (RVD), Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Experiments simulated both full and abbreviated protocols (axial-only). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate statistical differences in performance across configurations. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. With full multi-planar input, the KB model achieved a DSC of 0.91 ± 0.03 and RVD of 2.1 ± 6.4%, comparable to the fully supervised <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <msub><mrow><mi>PV</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>DL</mi></mrow> </msub> </math> model. Under axial-only conditions, the KB model maintained high performance (DSC:0.88 ± 0.04,RVD:3.4 ± 7.1%). PV agreement with <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <msub><mrow><mi>PV</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>ref</mi></mrow> </msub> </math> remained excellent across conditions (ICC>0.90). The proposed KB DL model enables accurate and flexible PV assessment under variable MRI protocols without requiring segmentation masks beyond the axial plane.