Artificial intelligence performance in image-based biliary atresia identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors
Affiliations (10)
Affiliations (10)
- Faculty of Medicine, Badji Mokhtar University, Annaba, Algeria. Electronic address: [email protected].
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Nouakchott Al Aasriya, Nouakchott, Mauritania.
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Gharyan, Gharyan, Libya.
- College of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya. Electronic address: [email protected].
- University of Jordan, Faculty of Medicine, Amman, Jordan.
- Alexandria School of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
- College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract
Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare condition that can lead to serious health complications. Artificial Intelligence (AI)- based medical imaging has shown potential to improve the detection of BA diagnosis, offering increased accuracy over traditional imaging methods. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of imaging-based AI for detecting BA. The study followed PRISMA DTA guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database. The search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of imaging-based AI models in detecting BA. Meanwhile, pre-defined eligibility criteria were used for the selection of studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated utilizing R 4.4.2. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-AI (QUADAS-AI) criteria and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool, and the GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the certainty of the synthesised evidence. A total of nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate to high, although a high risk of bias was noted in the index test domain of several studies. A total of 11,006 patients were analyzed, comprising 2,357 BA cases and 8,649 non-BA cases, with 11,500 ultrasound images. Patient-level analysis revealed pooled sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs of 93.8 % (95 % CI: 86-97.4 %), 93.2 % (95 % CI: 91.8-94.4 %), and 0.94, respectively. Additionally, the pooled results of image-based analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 86.9 % (95 % CI: 73.7-94.1 %), 94.3 % (95% CI: 90.9-96.4 %), and 0.965, respectively. AI shows satisfactory performance in the imaging-based diagnosis of biliary atresia. It should be regarded as an assistive tool that supports clinical decision-making, and further high-quality studies are needed to confirm its generalizability.