Automated CAD-RADS scoring from multiplanar CCTA images using radiomics-driven machine learning.

Authors

Corti A,Ronchetti F,Lo Iacono F,Chiesa M,Colombo G,Annoni A,Baggiano A,Carerj ML,Del Torto A,Fazzari F,Formenti A,Junod D,Mancini ME,Maragna R,Marchetti F,Sbordone FP,Tassetti L,Volpe A,Mushtaq S,Corino VDA,Pontone G

Affiliations (5)

  • Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Unit of Immunology and Functional Genomics, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract

Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS), a standardized reporting system of stenosis severity from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), is performed manually by expert radiologists, being time-consuming and prone to interobserver variability. While deep learning methods automating CAD-RADS scoring have been proposed, radiomics-based machine-learning approaches are lacking, despite their improved interpretability. This study aims to introduce a novel radiomics-based machine-learning approach for automating CAD-RADS scoring from CCTA images with multiplanar reconstruction. This retrospective monocentric study included 251 patients (male 70 %; mean age 60.5 ± 12.7) who underwent CCTA in 2016-2018 for clinical evaluation of CAD. Images were automatically segmented, and radiomic features were extracted. Clinical characteristics were collected. The image dataset was partitioned into training and test sets (90 %-10 %). The training phase encompassed feature scaling and selection, data balancing and model training within a 5-fold cross-validation. A cascade pipeline was implemented for both 6-class CAD-RADS scoring and 4-class therapy-oriented classification (0-1, 2, 3-4, 5), through consecutive sub-tasks. For each classification task the cascade pipeline was applied to develop clinical, radiomic, and combined models. The radiomic, combined and clinical models yielded AUC = 0.88 [0.86-0.88], AUC = 0.90 [0.88-0.90], and AUC = 0.66 [0.66-0.67] for the CAD-RADS scoring, and AUC = 0.93 [0.91-0.93], AUC = 0.97 [0.96-0.97], and AUC = 79 [0.78-0.79] for the therapy-oriented classification. The radiomic and combined models significantly outperformed (DeLong p-value < 0.05) the clinical one in class 1 and 2 (CAD-RADS cascade) and class 2 (therapy-oriented cascade). This study represents the first CAD-RADS classification radiomic model, guaranteeing higher explainability and providing a promising support system in coronary artery stenosis assessment.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.