Deep learning for dentomaxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography enhancement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors
Affiliations (8)
Affiliations (8)
- Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Vennelyst Boulevard 9, Aarhus C 8000, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Digital Dentistry, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Loma Linda School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, USA.
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Vennelyst Boulevard 9, Aarhus C 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Digital Dentistry, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in dentomaxillofacial imaging and radiotherapy but is limited by noise and low contrast resolution. Deep learning (DL) has emerged as a promising tool for CBCT enhancement, improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated DL-based techniques for dentomaxillofacial CBCT enhancement and their impact on objective image quality metrics. A systematic search across six databases identified studies applying DL for CBCT enhancement. Performance metrics included mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Risk of bias was assessed using the modified QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, with effect sizes expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) for MAE and RMSE and mean differences (MD) for PSNR and SSIM. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, covering CBCT-to-CT synthesis (27), metal artifact reduction (4), noise reduction (3), motion artifact reduction (1), and super-resolution (2). DL significantly reduced MAE (SMD: -4.24, 95% CI: -5.68 to -2.80, p < 0.0001) and RMSE (SMD: -1.21, 95% CI: -1.55 to -0.88, p < 0.0001), while improving PSNR (MD: 3.60, 95% CI: 3.00 to 4.20, p < 0.0001) and SSIM (MD: 0.072, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.089, p < 0.0001). High heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> > 99%) limits direct comparisons. DL improves CBCT image quality, but methodological variability and limited clinical validation necessitate further research.