Back to all papers

Feasibility of No-Code Deep Learning for Diagnosing Bone Metastasis in Bone Scans: A Comparative Study of Teachable Machine and ResNet.

May 1, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Pak S,Woo JY,Yang I,Son HJ,Kim SJ,Lee SH

Affiliations (5)

  • Department of Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Republic of Korea.
  • Department of Radiology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1 Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, Republic of Korea.
  • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Department of Radiology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1 Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, Republic of Korea. [email protected].

Abstract

This study explored the feasibility of developing a model that can diagnose positive and negative bone metastasis from bone scan images using Teachable Machine by Google, a no-code AI platform that does not require programming skills or a GPU environment. A fourth-year medical student trained deep learning models using a Teachable Machine on a dataset of 4626 bone scan images from patients with cancer (mean age 65.1 ± 11.3 years; 50.5% female). Because of severe class imbalance (bone metastasis positive:negative = 400:4226), we compared the diagnostic performance of two strategies (original set and augmented dataset with tenfold data augmentation applied to positive images). We investigated the diagnostic performance using various hyperparameters (epochs 50-1000, batch sizes 16-32) with a learning rate of 0.001. The final model generated by Teachable Machine was compared with a conventional deep learning model based on ResNet50. The combination of epoch = 150 and batch size = 16 showed the optimal diagnostic performance. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 57.1%, 93.9%, 90.4%, and 68.7%, respectively. Both Teachable Machine and ResNet50 showed good diagnostic performance (area under the curve = 0.812 and 0.869, respectively), although the diagnostic performance of Teachable Machine was inferior to that of the conventional ResNet50 model (p < 0.001). Given its convenience, Teachable Machine represents a valuable and accessible tool for medical education and preliminary model development. It allows researchers without programming skills or GPU resources to construct feasibility models for medical image classification.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.