Back to all papers

Breast cancer risk assessment for screening: a hybrid artificial intelligence approach.

Authors

Tendero R,Larroza A,Pérez-Benito FJ,Perez-Cortes JC,Román M,Llobet R

Affiliations (5)

  • Instituto Tecnológico de la Informática, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, València, Spain.
  • Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, València, Spain.
  • Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Research Institute), Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Instituto Tecnológico de la Informática, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, València, Spain. [email protected].
  • Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, València, Spain. [email protected].

Abstract

This study evaluates whether integrating clinical data with mammographic features using artificial intelligence (AI) improves 2-year breast cancer risk prediction compared to using either data type alone. This retrospective nested case-control study included 2193 women (mean age, 59 ± 5 years) screened at Hospital del Mar, Spain (2013-2020), with 418 cases (mammograms taken 2 years before diagnosis) and 1775 controls (cancer-free for ≥ 2 years). Three models were evaluated: (1) ERTpd + im, based on Extremely Randomized Trees (ERT), split into sub-models for personal data (ERTpd) and image features (ERTim); (2) an image-only model (CNN); and (3) a hybrid model (ERTpd + im + CNN). Five-fold cross-validation, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), bootstrapping for confidence intervals, and DeLong tests for paired data assessed performance. Robustness was evaluated across breast density quartiles and detection type (screen-detected vs. interval cancers). The hybrid model achieved an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.76), significantly outperforming the CNN model (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.70-0.75; p < 0.05) and slightly surpassing ERTpd + im (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.70-0.76). Sub-models ERTpd and ERTim had AUCs of 0.59 and 0.73, respectively. The hybrid model performed consistently across breast density quartiles (p > 0.05) and better for screen-detected (AUC, 0.79) than interval cancers (AUC, 0.59; p < 0.001). This study shows that integrating clinical and mammographic data with AI improves 2-year breast cancer risk prediction, outperforming single-source models. The hybrid model demonstrated higher accuracy and robustness across breast density quartiles, with better performance for screen-detected cancers. Question Current breast cancer risk models have limitations in accuracy. Can integrating clinical and mammographic data using artificial intelligence (AI) improve short-term risk prediction? Findings A hybrid model combining clinical and imaging data achieved the highest accuracy in predicting 2-year breast cancer risk, outperforming models using either data type alone. Clinical relevance Integrating clinical and mammographic data with AI improves breast cancer risk prediction. This approach enables personalized screening strategies and supports early detection. It helps identify high-risk women and optimizes the use of additional assessments within screening programs.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.