Concordance between single-slice abdominal computed tomography-based and bioelectrical impedance-based analysis of body composition in a prospective study.

Authors

Fehrenbach U,Hosse C,Wienbrandt W,Walter-Rittel T,Kolck J,Auer TA,Blüthner E,Tacke F,Beetz NL,Geisel D

Affiliations (4)

  • Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany. [email protected].
  • Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany.
  • Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

Body composition analysis (BCA) is a recognized indicator of patient frailty. Apart from the established bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), computed tomography (CT)-derived BCA is being increasingly explored. The aim of this prospective study was to directly compare BCA obtained from BIA and CT. A total of 210 consecutive patients scheduled for CT, including a high proportion of cancer patients, were prospectively enrolled. Immediately prior to the CT scan, all patients underwent BIA. CT-based BCA was performed using a single-slice AI tool for automated detection and segmentation at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). BIA-based parameters, body fat mass (BFM<sub>BIA</sub>) and skeletal muscle mass (SMM<sub>BIA</sub>), CT-based parameters, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue area (SATA<sub>CT</sub> and VATA<sub>CT</sub>) and total abdominal muscle area (TAMA<sub>CT</sub>) were determined. Indices were calculated by normalizing the BIA and CT parameters to patient's weight (body fat percentage (BFP<sub>BIA</sub>) and body fat index (BFI<sub>CT</sub>)) or height (skeletal muscle index (SMI<sub>BIA</sub>) and lumbar skeletal muscle index (LSMI<sub>CT</sub>)). Parameters representing fat, BFM<sub>BIA</sub> and SATA<sub>CT</sub> + VATA<sub>CT</sub>, and parameters representing muscle tissue, SMM<sub>BIA</sub> and TAMA<sub>CT</sub>, showed strong correlations in female (fat: r = 0.95; muscle: r = 0.72; p < 0.001) and male (fat: r = 0.91; muscle: r = 0.71; p < 0.001) patients. Linear regression analysis was statistically significant (fat: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73 (female) and 0.74 (male); muscle: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.56 (female) and 0.56 (male); p < 0.001), showing that BFI<sub>CT</sub> and LSMI<sub>CT</sub> allowed prediction of BFP<sub>BIA</sub> and SMI<sub>BIA</sub> for both sexes. CT-based BCA strongly correlates with BIA results and yields quantitative results for BFP and SMI comparable to the existing gold standard. Question CT-based body composition analysis (BCA) is moving more and more into clinical focus, but validation against established methods is lacking. Findings Fully automated CT-based BCA correlates very strongly with guideline-accepted bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Clinical relevance BCA is currently moving further into clinical focus to improve assessment of patient frailty and individualize therapies accordingly. Comparability with established BIA strengthens the value of CT-based BCA and supports its translation into clinical routine.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.