Influence of content-based image retrieval on the accuracy and inter-reader agreement of usual interstitial pneumonia CT pattern classification.

Authors

Park S,Hwang HJ,Yun J,Chae EJ,Choe J,Lee SM,Lee HN,Shin SY,Park H,Jeong H,Kim MJ,Lee JH,Jo KW,Baek S,Seo JB

Affiliations (5)

  • Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. [email protected].
  • Department of Convergence Medicine, Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Department of Pulmonology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

To investigate whether a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) of similar chest CT images can help usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) CT pattern classifications among readers with varying levels of experience. This retrospective study included patients who underwent high-resolution chest CT between 2013 and 2015 for the initial workup for fibrosing interstitial lung disease. UIP classifications were assigned to CT images by three thoracic radiologists, which served as the ground truth. One hundred patients were selected as queries. The CBIR retrieved the top three similar CT images with UIP classifications using a deep learning algorithm. The diagnostic accuracies and inter-reader agreement of nine readers before and after CBIR were evaluated. Of 587 patients (mean age, 63 years; 356 men), 100 query cases (26 UIP patterns, 26 probable UIP patterns, 5 indeterminate for UIP, and 43 alternative diagnoses) were selected. After CBIR, the mean accuracy (61.3% to 67.1%; p = 0.011) and inter-reader agreement (Fleiss Kappa, 0.400 to 0.476; p = 0.003) were slightly improved. The accuracies of the radiologist group for all CT patterns except indeterminate for UIP increased after CBIR; however, they did not reach statistical significance. The resident and pulmonologist groups demonstrated mixed results: accuracy decreased for UIP pattern, increased for alternative diagnosis, and varied for others. CBIR slightly improved diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement in UIP pattern classifications. However, its impact varied depending on the readers' level of experience, suggesting that the current CBIR system may be beneficial when used to complement the interpretations of experienced readers. Question CT pattern classification is important for the standardized assessment and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but requires radiologic expertise and shows inter-reader variability. Findings CBIR slightly improved diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement for UIP CT pattern classifications overall. Clinical relevance The proposed CBIR system may guide consistent work-up and treatment strategies by enhancing accuracy and inter-reader agreement in UIP CT pattern classifications by experienced readers whose expertise and experience can effectively interact with CBIR results.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.