Artificial intelligence and radiomics in bladder cancer MRI: a scoping review of applications, performance, and barriers to clinical translation.
Authors
Affiliations (6)
Affiliations (6)
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo, Palermo, Italy. [email protected].
- Ri.MED Foundation, Palermo, Italy.
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo, Palermo, Italy. [email protected].
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore-Einstein Medical Center, The Bronx, United States.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics show significant potential to augment bladder cancer (BC) MRI but face a critical translational gap. This scoping review of 79 studies maps a rapidly growing field dominated by retrospective, single-center designs lacking external validation. While diagnostic performance for staging is promising (AUC up to 0.99 in ideal settings), robust multi-center studies report more realistic AUCs of 0.85-0.95, positioning AI as a complement to VI-RADS, especially for equivocal cases. Evidence supports integration via simplified protocols (T2w-only) and workflow tools. However, systemic barriers impede progress: poor reporting transparency, a near-total absence of prospective utility trials, and a narrow focus on pre-treatment diagnosis. The current evidence suggests a high risk of translational stagnation. Realizing the transformative potential requires a fundamental reorientation toward rigorous, multi-center evaluation and transparency. Priorities must include mandatory adherence to reporting standards (TRIPOD + AI), the creation of public multi-center benchmarks, and a redesign of validation paradigms to prioritize prospective studies measuring clinical utility - such as impact on treatment decisions - over retrospective diagnostic accuracy alone. Only by prioritizing transparency, interdisciplinary collaboration, and patient-centered outcomes can AI evolve from a promising research instrument into a reliable clinical tool for BC management.