Back to all papers

Deep learning-based chemical shift-artifact correction of ZTE MRI for enhanced bone depiction of the lumbar spine.

July 6, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Obermüller C,Bach U,Zecca F,Heidt F,Lohezic M,Mandava S,de Arcos Rodriguez J,Wiesinger F,Guggenberger R,Burian E,Kroschke J,Ensle F

Affiliations (8)

  • Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. [email protected].
  • Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Department of Medical Imaging, Oncopole Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
  • GE HealthCare, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • GE HealthCare, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • GE HealthCare, Valencia, Spain.
  • GE HealthCare, Munich, Germany.
  • Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

Zero echo time (ZTE) is an advanced MRI technique providing CT-like images of mineralized tissues. This study evaluates the impact of deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction with chemical shift correction (DLCSC) on osseous depiction in ZTE MRI of the lumbar spine, compared to standard DL and non-DL reconstruction. This retrospective, single-center study included 38 patients undergoing 3 T ZTE MRI of the lumbar spine. K-space data were reconstructed using three methods: non-DL, standard DL, and a prototype DLCSC algorithm. Quantitative image sharpness, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Two radiologists independently rated pathology-related criteria (n = 22) and bone depiction quality (n = 38) on a 4-point scale. Ordinal data were analyzed using the Friedman test, and inter-reader agreement was assessed with weighted Cohen's kappa. DLCSC images yielded quantitatively sharper images compared to non-DL (p = 0.010) and standard DL (p < 0.001). SNR and CNR were significantly higher in DLCSC and DL than in non-DL (p < 0.001). In the qualitative assessment, mean scores for all criteria of pathologies and bone depiction quality improved significantly from non-DL and DL to DLCSC (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of differences in classification of pathologies (p > 0.05). Inter-reader agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.867-0.901). DLCSC image reconstruction of ZTE MRI can improve bone depiction of the lumbar spine compared to standard DL and non-DL reconstruction.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.