Physiological Confounds in BOLD-fMRI and Their Correction.
Authors
Affiliations (7)
Affiliations (7)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Department of Electrical & Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
- Department of Medical Physics, Alberta Heath Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has opened new frontiers in neuroscience by instrumentally driving our understanding of brain function and development. Despite its substantial successes, fMRI studies persistently encounter obstacles stemming from inherent, unavoidable physiological confounds. The adverse effects of these confounds are especially noticeable with higher magnetic fields, which have been gaining momentum in fMRI experiments. This review focuses on the four major physiological confounds impacting fMRI studies: low-frequency fluctuations in both breathing depth and rate, low-frequency fluctuations in the heart rate, thoracic movements, and cardiac pulsatility. Over the past three decades, numerous correction techniques have emerged to address these challenges. Correction methods have effectively enhanced the detection of task-activated voxels and minimized the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in functional connectivity studies. While confound correction methods have merit, they also have certain limitations. For instance, model-based approaches require externally recorded physiological data that is often unavailable in fMRI studies. Methods reliant on independent component analysis, on the other hand, need prior knowledge about the number of components. Machine learning techniques, although showing potential, are still in the early stages of development and require additional validation. This article reviews the mechanics of physiological confound correction methods, scrutinizes their performance and limitations, and discusses their impact on fMRI studies.