Back to all papers

Ex vivo human brain volumetry: Validation of MRI measurements.

Authors

Gérin-Lajoie A,Adame-Gonzalez W,Frigon EM,Guerra Sanches L,Nayouf A,Boire D,Dadar M,Maranzano J

Affiliations (4)

  • Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
  • Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Abstract

The volume of in vivo human brains is determined with various MRI measurement tools that have not been assessed against a gold standard. The purpose of this study was to validate the MRI brain volumes by scanning ex vivo, in situ specimens, which allows the extraction of the brain after the scan to compare its volume with the gold-standard water displacement method (WDM). The 3T MRI T<sub>2</sub>-weighted, T<sub>1</sub>-weighted, and MP2RAGE images of seven anatomical heads fixed with an alcohol-formaldehyde solution were acquired. The gray and white matter were assessed using two methods: (i) a manual intensity-based threshold segmentation using Display (MINC-ToolKit) and (ii) an automatic deep learning-based segmentation tool (SynthSeg). The brains were extracted and their volumes measured with the WDM after the removal of their meninges and a midsagittal cut. Volumes from all methods were compared with the ground truth (WDM volumes) using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Mean brain volumes, in cubic centimeters, were 1111.14 ± 121.78 for WDM, 1020.29 ± 70.01 for manual T<sub>2</sub>-weighted, 1056.29 ± 90.54 for automatic T<sub>2</sub>-weighted, 1094.69 ± 100.51 for automatic T<sub>1</sub>-weighted, 1066.56 ± 96.52 for automatic magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo first inversion time, and 1156.18 ± 121.87 for automatic magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo second inversion time. All volumetry methods were significantly different (F = 17.874; p < 0.001) from the WDM volumes, except the automatic T<sub>1</sub>-weighted volumes. SynthSeg accurately determined the brain volume in ex vivo, in situ T<sub>1</sub>-weighted MRI scans. The results suggested that given the contrast similarity between the ex vivo and in vivo sequences, the brain volumes of clinical studies are most probably sufficiently accurate, with some degree of underestimation depending on the sequence used.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.