AI-Powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI)-A Comprehensive Neurological Protocol From a Single MRI Scan.
Authors
Affiliations (4)
Affiliations (4)
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abstract
MRI is essential for diagnosing and monitoring neurological diseases. Conventional protocols require multiple sequences to obtain complementary contrasts, increasing scan time, cost, and tolerability. Generating multiple contrasts from a single acquisition may streamline workflow while maintaining clinical utility. To train attention-based convolutional neural networks (ACNNs) to generate clinical-quality Fluid-Attenuated-Inversion-Recovery (FLAIR), Magnetization-Prepared-Rapid-Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE), R2* maps, and derived contrasts from a single Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (GEPCI) acquisition. Retrospective. 43 MRI scans from individuals with multiple sclerosis (25/18 F/M, 49 ± 11 years-of-age). 3 T MRI, 3D GEPCI, MPRAGE, and FLAIR. Technical quality of AI-generated contrasts was evaluated against directly acquired MRI using structural similarity index (SSIM). Clinical image quality was assessed by physicians. Lesion volumes and counts were obtained using automated segmentation. One-sample one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to establish the clinical quality of images. Agreement between native- and AI-derived lesion volume and lesion count measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Quantitative accuracy for R2* maps was evaluated using normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE). AI-generated FLAIR and MPRAGE achieved mean SSIM values of 0.923 ± 0.028 and 0.935 ± 0.022, respectively. Generated R2* maps achieved a mean SSIM of 0.996 ± 0.006 and NRMSE of 0.031 ± 0.020. Physicians-assigned mean clinical quality ratings of 4.2 for GEPCI-FLAIR and 4.5 for GEPCI-MPRAGE exceeded the 4.0 clinical standard on a 1-to-5 scale. Lesion volume and count comparisons from automated segmentation showed strong agreement between AI-generated and ground-truth measurements: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.988 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.933, ICC = 0.988 and ICC = 0.967, respectively. AI-GEPCI generated multiple clinically relevant MRI contrasts from a single GEPCI acquisition with high similarity to corresponding acquired images, supporting high-quality, intrinsically co-registered multi-contrast brain evaluation. 2. Stage 1.