A Deep Learning-Based De-Artifact Diffusion Model for Removing Motion Artifacts in Knee MRI.
Authors
Affiliations (4)
Affiliations (4)
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
- Department of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial Orthopaedic Hospital, Chengdu, China.
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
Motion artifacts are common for knee MRI, which usually lead to rescanning. Effective removal of motion artifacts would be clinically useful. To construct an effective deep learning-based model to remove motion artifacts for knee MRI using real-world data. Retrospective. Model construction: 90 consecutive patients (1997 2D slices) who had knee MRI images with motion artifacts paired with immediately rescanned images without artifacts served as ground truth. Internal test dataset: 25 patients (795 slices) from another period; external test dataset: 39 patients (813 slices) from another hospital. 3-T/1.5-T knee MRI with T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, and proton-weighted imaging. A deep learning-based supervised conditional diffusion model was constructed. Objective metrics (root mean square error [RMSE], peak signal-to-noise ratio [PSNR], structural similarity [SSIM]) and subjective ratings were used for image quality assessment, which were compared with three other algorithms (enhanced super-resolution [ESR], enhanced deep super-resolution, and ESR using a generative adversarial network). Diagnostic performance of the output images was compared with the rescanned images. The Kappa Test, Pearson chi-square test, Fredman's rank-sum test, and the marginal homogeneity test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Subjective ratings showed significant improvements in the output images compared to the input, with no significant difference from the ground truth. The constructed method demonstrated the smallest RMSE (11.44 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> 5.47 in the validation cohort; 13.95 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> 4.32 in the external test cohort), the largest PSNR (27.61 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> 3.20 in the validation cohort; 25.64 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> 2.67 in the external test cohort) and SSIM (0.97 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.04 in the validation cohort; 0.94 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.04 in the external test cohort) compared to the other three algorithms. The output images achieved comparable diagnostic capability as the ground truth for multiple anatomical structures. The constructed model exhibited feasibility and effectiveness, and outperformed multiple other algorithms for removing motion artifacts in knee MRI. Level 3. Stage 2.