The present study examined an integrated multiple neuroimaging modality (T1 structural, Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), and resting-state FMRI (rsFMRI)) to predict aphasia severity using Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) in 76 individuals with post-stroke aphasia. We employed Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Random Forest (RF) models with supervised feature selection and a stacked feature prediction approach. The SVR model outperformed RF, achieving an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 16.38±5.57, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of 0.70±0.13, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 12.67±3.27, compared to RF's RMSE of 18.41±4.34, r of 0.66±0.15, and MAE of 14.64±3.04. Resting-state neural activity and structural integrity emerged as crucial predictors of aphasia severity, appearing in the top 20% of predictor combinations for both SVR and RF. Finally, the feature selection method revealed that functional connectivity in both hemispheres and between homologous language areas is critical for predicting language outcomes in patients with aphasia. The statistically significant difference in performance between the model using only single modality and the optimal multi-modal SVR/RF model (which included both resting-state connectivity and structural information) underscores that aphasia severity is influenced by factors beyond lesion location and volume. These findings suggest that integrating multiple neuroimaging modalities enhances the prediction of language outcomes in aphasia beyond lesion characteristics alone, offering insights that could inform personalized rehabilitation strategies.

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential to enhance various aspects of oncology, spanning the cancer care continuum. This review provides an overview of current and emerging AI applications, from risk assessment and early detection to treatment and supportive care. AI-driven tools are being developed to integrate diverse data sources, including multi-omics and electronic health records, to improve cancer risk stratification and personalize prevention strategies. In screening and diagnosis, AI algorithms show promise in augmenting the accuracy and efficiency of medical image analysis and histopathology interpretation. AI also offers opportunities to refine treatment planning, optimize radiation therapy, and personalize systemic therapy selection. Furthermore, AI is explored for its potential to improve survivorship care by tailoring interventions and to enhance end-of-life care through improved symptom management and prognostic modeling. Beyond care delivery, AI augments clinical workflows, streamlines the dissemination of up-to-date evidence, and captures critical patient-reported outcomes for clinical decision support and outcomes assessment. However, the successful integration of AI into clinical practice requires addressing key challenges, including rigorous validation of algorithms, ensuring data privacy and security, and mitigating potential biases. Effective implementation necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration and comprehensive education for health care professionals. The synergistic interaction between AI and clinical expertise is crucial for realizing the potential of AI to contribute to personalized and effective cancer care. This review highlights the current state of AI in oncology and underscores the importance of responsible development and implementation.

Burn injuries represent a significant clinical challenge due to the complexity of accurately assessing burn depth, which directly influences the course of treatment and patient outcomes. Traditional diagnostic methods primarily rely on visual inspection by experienced burn surgeons. Studies report diagnostic accuracies of around 76% for experts, dropping to nearly 50% for less experienced clinicians. Such inaccuracies can result in suboptimal clinical decisions-delaying vital surgical interventions in severe cases or initiating unnecessary treatments for superficial burns. This diagnostic variability not only compromises patient care but also strains health care resources and increases the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Hence, a more consistent and precise approach to burn classification is urgently needed. The objective is to determine whether a multimodal integrated artificial intelligence (AI) system for accurate classification of burn depth can preserve diagnostic accuracy and provide an important resource when used as part of the electronic medical record (EMR). This study used a novel multimodal AI system, integrating digital photographs and ultrasound tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) data to accurately assess burn depth. These imaging modalities were accessed and processed through an EMR system, enabling real-time data retrieval and AI-assisted evaluation. TDI was instrumental in evaluating the biomechanical properties of subcutaneous tissues, using color-coded images to identify burn-induced changes in tissue stiffness and elasticity. The collected imaging data were uploaded to the EMR system (DrChrono), where they were processed by a vision-language model built on GPT-4 architecture. This model received expert-formulated prompts describing how to interpret both digital and TDI images, guiding the AI in making explainable classifications. This study evaluated whether a multimodal AI classifier, designed to identify first-, second-, and third-degree burns, could be effectively applied to imaging data stored within an EMR system. The classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 84.38%, significantly surpassing human performance benchmarks typically cited in the literature. This highlights the potential of the AI model to serve as a robust clinical decision support tool, especially in settings lacking highly specialized expertise. In addition to accuracy, the classifier demonstrated strong performance across multiple evaluation metrics. The classifier's ability to distinguish between burn severities was further validated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic: 0.97 for first-degree, 0.96 for second-degree, and a perfect 1.00 for third-degree burns, each with narrow 95% CIs. The storage of multimodal imaging data within the EMR, along with the ability for post hoc analysis by AI algorithms, offers significant advancements in burn care, enabling real-time burn depth prediction on currently available data. Using digital photos for superficial burns, easily diagnosed through physical examinations, reduces reliance on TDI, while TDI helps distinguish deep second- and third-degree burns, enhancing diagnostic efficiency.

We aimed to review the role of functional imaging in cervical cancer to underscore its significance in the diagnosis and management of cervical cancer and in improving patient outcomes. This rapid literature review targeting the clinical guidelines for functional imaging in cervical cancer sourced literature from 2017 to 2023 using PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus. Keywords such as cervical cancer, cervical neoplasms, functional imaging, stag*, treatment response, monitor* and New Zealand or NZ were used with Boolean operators to maximise results. Emphasis was on English full research studies pertinent to New Zealand. The study quality of the reviewed articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. The search yielded a total of 21 papers after all duplicates and yields that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. Only one paper was found to incorporate the New Zealand context. The papers reviewed yielded results that demonstrate the important role of functional imaging in cervical cancer diagnosis, staging and treatment response monitoring. Techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) provide deep insights into tumour behaviour, facilitating personalised care. Integration of artificial intelligence in image analysis promises increased accuracy of these modalities. Functional imaging could play a significant role in a unified approach in New Zealand to improve patient outcomes for cervical cancer management. Therefore, this study advocates for New Zealand's medical sector to harness functional imaging's potential in cervical cancer management.

This study evaluates the efficiency, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness of radiology reporting using audio multimodal large language models (LLMs) compared to conventional reporting with speech recognition software. We hypothesized that providing minimal audio input would enable a multimodal LLM to generate complete radiological reports. 480 reports from 80 retrospective multimodal imaging studies were reported by two board-certified radiologists using three workflows: conventional workflow (C-WF) with speech recognition software to generate findings and impressions separately and LLM-based workflow (LLM-WF) using the state-of-the-art LLMs GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5. Outcome measures included reporting time, corrections and personnel cost per report. Two radiologists assessed formal structure and report quality. Statistical analysis used ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (p < 0.05). LLM-WF significantly reduced reporting time (GPT-4o/Sonnet 3.5: 38.9 s ± 22.7 s vs. C-WF: 88.0 s ± 60.9 s, p < 0.01), required fewer corrections (GPT-4o: 1.0 ± 1.1, Sonnet 3.5: 0.9 ± 1.0 vs. C-WF: 2.4 ± 2.5, p < 0.01), and lowered costs (GPT-4o: $2.3 ± $1.4, Sonnet 3.5: $2.4 ± $1.4 vs. C-WF: $3.0 ± $2.1, p < 0.01). Reports generated with Sonnet 3.5 were rated highest in quality, while GPT-4o and conventional reports showed no difference. Multimodal LLMs can generate high-quality radiology reports based solely on minimal audio input, with greater speed, fewer corrections, and reduced costs compared to conventional speech-based workflows. However, future implementation may involve licensing costs, and generalizability to broader clinical contexts warrants further evaluation. Question Comparing time, accuracy, cost, and report quality of reporting using audio input functionality of GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 to conventional reporting with speech recognition. Findings Large language models enable radiological reporting via minimal audio input, reducing turnaround time and costs without quality loss compared to conventional reporting with speech recognition. Clinical relevance Large language model-based reporting from minimal audio input has the potential to improve efficiency and report quality, supporting more streamlined workflows in clinical radiology.

Segmenting liver tumors in medical imaging is pivotal for precise diagnosis, treatment, and evaluating therapy outcomes. Even with modern imaging technologies, fully automated segmentation systems have not overcome the challenge posed by the diversity in the shape, size, and texture of liver tumors. Such delays often hinder clinicians from making timely and accurate decisions. This study tries to resolve these issues with the development of UIGO. This new deep learning model merges U-Net and Inception networks, incorporating advanced feature selection and optimization strategies. The goals of UIGO include achieving high precision segmented results while maintaining optimal computational requirements for efficiency in real-world clinical use. Publicly available liver tumor segmentation datasets were used for testing the model: LiTS (Liver Tumor Segmentation Challenge), CHAOS (Combined Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation), and 3D-IRCADb1 (3D-IRCAD liver dataset). With various tumor shapes and sizes ranging across different imaging modalities such as CT and MRI, these datasets ensured comprehensive testing of UIGO's performance in diverse clinical scenarios. The experimental outcomes show the effectiveness of UIGO with a segmentation accuracy of 99.93%, an AUC score of 99.89%, a Dice Coefficient of 0.997, and an IoU of 0.998. UIGO demonstrated higher performance than other contemporary liver tumor segmentation techniques, indicating the system's ability to enhance clinician's ability to deliver precise and prompt evaluations at a lower computational expense. This study underscores the effort towards advanced streamlined, dependable, and clinically useful devices for liver tumor segmentation in medical imaging.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) - a physiological indicator of coronary stenosis significance - has now become a widely used parameter also in the guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several studies have shown the superiority of FFR compared to visual assessment, contributing to the reduction in clinical endpoints. However, the current approach to FFR assessment requires coronary instrumentation with a dedicated pressure wire and thus increasing invasiveness, cost, and duration of the procedure. Alternative, noninvasive methods of FFR assessment based on computational fluid dynamics are being widely tested; these approaches are generally not fully automated and may sometimes require substantial computational power. Nowadays, one of the most rapidly expanding fields in medicine is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in therapy optimization, diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification. AI usage contributes to the development of more sophisticated methods of imaging analysis and allows for the derivation of clinically important parameters in a faster and more accurate way. Over the recent years, AI utility in deriving FFR in a noninvasive manner has been increasingly reported. In this review, we critically summarize current knowledge in the field of AI-derived FFR based on data from computed tomography angiography, invasive angiography, optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound. Available solutions, possible future directions in optimizing cathlab performance, including the use of mixed reality, as well as current limitations standing behind the wide adoption of these techniques, are overviewed.

This study evaluated the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in predicting best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for patients with multiple retinal diseases, using multimodal medical imaging including macular optical coherence tomography (OCT), optic disc OCT and fundus images. The goal was to enhance clinical BCVA evaluation efficiency and precision. A retrospective study used data from 2545 patients (4028 eyes) for training, 896 (1006 eyes) for testing and 196 (200 eyes) for internal validation, with an external prospective dataset of 741 patients (1381 eyes). Single-modality analyses employed different backbone networks and feature fusion methods, while multimodal fusion combined modalities using average aggregation, concatenation/reduction and maximum feature selection. Predictive accuracy was measured by mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE) and R² score. Macular OCT achieved better single-modality prediction than optic disc OCT, with MAE of 3.851 vs 4.977 and RMSE of 7.844 vs 10.026. Fundus images showed an MAE of 3.795 and RMSE of 7.954. Multimodal fusion significantly improved accuracy, with the best results using average aggregation, achieving an MAE of 2.865, RMSE of 6.229 and R² of 0.935. External validation yielded an MAE of 8.38 and RMSE of 10.62. Multimodal fusion provided the most accurate BCVA predictions, demonstrating AI's potential to improve clinical evaluation. However, challenges remain regarding disease diversity and applicability in resource-limited settings.

This study investigated radiologists' perceptions of AI-generated, patient-friendly radiology reports across three modalities: MRI, CT, and mammogram/ultrasound. The evaluation focused on report correctness, completeness, terminology complexity, and emotional impact. Seventy-nine radiologists from four major Saudi Arabian hospitals assessed AI-simplified versions of clinical radiology reports. Each participant reviewed one report from each modality and completed a structured questionnaire covering factual correctness, completeness, terminology complexity, and emotional impact. A structured and detailed prompt was used to guide ChatGPT-4 in generating the reports, which included clear findings, a lay summary, glossary, and clarification of ambiguous elements. Statistical analyses included descriptive summaries, Friedman tests, and Pearson correlations. Radiologists rated mammogram reports highest for correctness (M = 4.22), followed by CT (4.05) and MRI (3.95). Completeness scores followed a similar trend. Statistically significant differences were found in correctness (χ²(2) = 17.37, p < 0.001) and completeness (χ²(2) = 13.13, p = 0.001). Anxiety and complexity ratings were moderate, with MRI reports linked to slightly higher concern. A weak positive correlation emerged between radiologists' experience and mammogram correctness ratings (r = .235, p = .037). Radiologists expressed overall support for AI-generated simplified radiology reports when created using a structured prompt that includes summaries, glossaries, and clarification of ambiguous findings. While mammography and CT reports were rated favorably, MRI reports showed higher emotional impact, highlighting a need for clearer and more emotionally supportive language.

Radiomics models frequently face challenges related to reproducibility and robustness. To address these issues, we propose a multimodal, multi-model fusion framework utilizing stacking ensemble learning for prognostic prediction in head and neck cancer (HNC). This approach seeks to improve the accuracy and reliability of survival predictions. A total of 806 cases from nine centers were collected; 143 cases from two centers were assigned as the external validation cohort, while the remaining 663 were stratified and randomly split into training (n = 530) and internal validation (n = 133) sets. Radiomics features were extracted according to IBSI standards, and deep learning features were obtained using a 3D DenseNet-121 model. Following feature selection, the selected features were input into Cox, SVM, RSF, DeepCox, and DeepSurv models. A stacking fusion strategy was employed to develop the prognostic model. Model performance was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and time-dependent ROC curves. On the external validation set, the model using combined PET and CT radiomics features achieved superior performance compared to single-modality models, with the RSF model obtaining the highest concordance index (C-index) of 0.7302. When using deep features extracted by 3D DenseNet-121, the PET + CT-based models demonstrated significantly improved prognostic accuracy, with Deepsurv and DeepCox achieving C-indices of 0.9217 and 0.9208, respectively. In stacking models, the PET + CT model using only radiomics features reached a C-index of 0.7324, while the deep feature-based stacking model achieved 0.9319. The best performance was obtained by the multi-feature fusion model, which integrated both radiomics and deep learning features from PET and CT, yielding a C-index of 0.9345. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis further confirmed the fusion model's ability to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk groups. The stacking-based ensemble model demonstrates superior performance compared to individual machine learning models, markedly improving the robustness of prognostic predictions.