BackgroundBreast microcalcification diagnostics are challenging due to their subtle presentation, overlapping with benign findings, and high inter-reader variability, often leading to unnecessary biopsies. While deep learning (DL) models - particularly deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) - have shown potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, their clinical application remains limited by the need for large annotated datasets and the "black box" nature of their decision-making. PurposeTo develop and validate a deep learning model (DCNN) using a double transfer learning (d-TL) strategy for classifying suspected mammographic microcalcifications, with explainable AI (XAI) techniques to support model interpretability. Material and methodsA retrospective dataset of 396 annotated regions of interest (ROIs) from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images of 194 patients who underwent stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy at the Womens Hospital radiological department, Helsinki University Hospital, was collected. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets (24% test set, balanced for benign and malignant cases). A ResNeXt-based DCNN was developed using a d-TL approach: first pretrained on ImageNet, then adapted using an intermediate mammography dataset before fine-tuning on the target microcalcification data. Saliency maps were generated using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to evaluate the visual relevance of model predictions. Diagnostic performance was compared to a radiologists BI-RADS-based assessment, using final histopathology as the reference standard. ResultsThe ensemble DCNN achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.76, with 65% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 79% positive predictive value (PPV), and 70% accuracy. The radiologist achieved an AUC of 0.65 with 100% sensitivity but lower specificity (30%) and PPV (59%). Grad-CAM visualizations showed consistent activation of the correct ROIs, even in misclassified cases where confidence scores fell below the threshold. ConclusionThe DCNN model utilizing d-TL achieved performance comparable to radiologists, with higher specificity and PPV than BI-RADS. The approach addresses data limitation issues and may help reduce additional imaging and unnecessary biopsies.

The OncotypeDX 21-gene assay is a widely adopted tool for estimating recurrence risk and informing chemotherapy decisions in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Although informative, its high cost and long turnaround time limit accessibility and delay treatment in low- and middle-income countries, creating a need for alternative solutions. This study presents a deep learning-based approach for predicting OncotypeDX recurrence scores directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images. Our approach leverages a deep learning foundation model pre-trained on 171,189 slides via self-supervised learning, which is fine-tuned for our task. The model was developed and validated using five independent cohorts, out of which three are external. On the two external cohorts that include OncotypeDX scores, the model achieved an AUC of 0.825 and 0.817, and identified 21.9% and 25.1% of the patients as low-risk with sensitivity of 0.97 and 0.95 and negative predictive value of 0.97 and 0.96, showing strong generalizability despite variations in staining protocols and imaging devices. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients classified as low-risk by the model had a significantly better prognosis than those classified as high-risk, with a hazard ratio of 4.1 (P<0.001) and 2.0 (P<0.01) on the two external cohorts that include patient outcomes. This artificial intelligence-driven solution offers a rapid, cost-effective, and scalable alternative to genomic testing, with the potential to enhance personalized treatment planning, especially in resource-constrained settings.

In recent years, different Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) approaches have been applied for image classification in general and specific problems such as breast cancer diagnosis, but there is no standardising approach to facilitate comparison and synergy. This paper attempts a step-by-step approach to standardise a common application of image classification with the specific problem of classifying breast ultrasound images for breast cancer diagnosis as an illustrative example. In this study, three distinct datasets: Breast Ultrasound Image (BUSI), Breast Ultrasound Image (BUI), and Ultrasound Breast Images for Breast Cancer (UBIBC) datasets have been used to build and fine-tune custom and pre-trained CNN models systematically. Custom CNN models have been built, and hence, transfer learning (TL) has been applied to deploy a broad range of pre-trained models, optimised by applying data augmentation techniques and hyperparameter tuning. Models were trained and tested in scenarios involving limited and large datasets to gain insights into their robustness and generality. The obtained results indicated that the custom CNN and VGG19 are the two most suitable architectures for this problem. The experimental results highlight the significance of employing an effective step-by-step approach in image classification tasks to enhance the robustness and generalisation capabilities of CNN-based classifiers.

The scarcity and imbalance of medical image datasets hinder the development of robust computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer. This study explores the application of advanced generative models, based on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), for the synthesis of digital breast ultrasound images. Using a hybrid Conditional Variational Autoencoder-Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (CVAE-WGAN) architecture, we developed a system to generate high-quality synthetic images conditioned on the class (malignant vs. normal/benign). These synthetic images, generated from the low-resolution BreastMNIST dataset and filtered for quality, were systematically integrated with real training data at different mixing ratios (W). The performance of a CNN classifier trained on these mixed datasets was evaluated against a baseline model trained only on real data balanced with SMOTE. The optimal integration (mixing weight W=0.25) produced a significant performance increase on the real test set: +8.17% in macro-average F1-score and +4.58% in accuracy compared to using real data alone. Analysis confirmed the originality of the generated samples. This approach offers a promising solution for overcoming data limitations in image-based breast cancer diagnostics, potentially improving the capabilities of CAD systems.

BackgroundDifferent Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques have demonstrated promising results for data extraction from radiological reports. Both traditional rule-based methods like regular expressions (Regex) and modern Large Language Models (LLMs) can extract structured information. However, comparison between these approaches for extraction of specific radiological data elements has not been widely conducted. MethodsWe compared accuracy and processing time between Regex and LLM-based approaches for extracting BI-RADS scores from 7,764 radiology reports (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and biopsy). We developed a rule-based algorithm using Regex patterns and implemented an LLM-based extraction using the Rombos-LLM-V2.6-Qwen-14b model. A ground truth dataset of 199 manually classified reports was used for evaluation. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy in extracting BI-RADS scores between Regex and an LLM-based method (accuracy of 89.20% for Regex versus 87.69% for the LLM-based method; p=0.56). Compared to the LLM-based method, Regex processing was more efficient, completing the task 28,120 times faster (0.06 seconds vs. 1687.20 seconds). Further analysis revealed LLMs favored common classifications (particularly BI-RADS value of 2) while Regex more frequently returned "unclear" values. We also could confirm in our sample an already known laterality bias for breast cancer (BI-RADS 6) and detected a slight laterality skew for suspected breast cancer (BI-RADS 5) as well. ConclusionFor structured, standardized data like BI-RADS, traditional NLP techniques seem to be superior, though future work should explore hybrid approaches combining Regex precision for standardized elements with LLM contextual understanding for more complex information extraction tasks.