In recent years, different Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) approaches have been applied for image classification in general and specific problems such as breast cancer diagnosis, but there is no standardising approach to facilitate comparison and synergy. This paper attempts a step-by-step approach to standardise a common application of image classification with the specific problem of classifying breast ultrasound images for breast cancer diagnosis as an illustrative example. In this study, three distinct datasets: Breast Ultrasound Image (BUSI), Breast Ultrasound Image (BUI), and Ultrasound Breast Images for Breast Cancer (UBIBC) datasets have been used to build and fine-tune custom and pre-trained CNN models systematically. Custom CNN models have been built, and hence, transfer learning (TL) has been applied to deploy a broad range of pre-trained models, optimised by applying data augmentation techniques and hyperparameter tuning. Models were trained and tested in scenarios involving limited and large datasets to gain insights into their robustness and generality. The obtained results indicated that the custom CNN and VGG19 are the two most suitable architectures for this problem. The experimental results highlight the significance of employing an effective step-by-step approach in image classification tasks to enhance the robustness and generalisation capabilities of CNN-based classifiers.

The scarcity and imbalance of medical image datasets hinder the development of robust computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer. This study explores the application of advanced generative models, based on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), for the synthesis of digital breast ultrasound images. Using a hybrid Conditional Variational Autoencoder-Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (CVAE-WGAN) architecture, we developed a system to generate high-quality synthetic images conditioned on the class (malignant vs. normal/benign). These synthetic images, generated from the low-resolution BreastMNIST dataset and filtered for quality, were systematically integrated with real training data at different mixing ratios (W). The performance of a CNN classifier trained on these mixed datasets was evaluated against a baseline model trained only on real data balanced with SMOTE. The optimal integration (mixing weight W=0.25) produced a significant performance increase on the real test set: +8.17% in macro-average F1-score and +4.58% in accuracy compared to using real data alone. Analysis confirmed the originality of the generated samples. This approach offers a promising solution for overcoming data limitations in image-based breast cancer diagnostics, potentially improving the capabilities of CAD systems.

BackgroundDifferent Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques have demonstrated promising results for data extraction from radiological reports. Both traditional rule-based methods like regular expressions (Regex) and modern Large Language Models (LLMs) can extract structured information. However, comparison between these approaches for extraction of specific radiological data elements has not been widely conducted. MethodsWe compared accuracy and processing time between Regex and LLM-based approaches for extracting BI-RADS scores from 7,764 radiology reports (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and biopsy). We developed a rule-based algorithm using Regex patterns and implemented an LLM-based extraction using the Rombos-LLM-V2.6-Qwen-14b model. A ground truth dataset of 199 manually classified reports was used for evaluation. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy in extracting BI-RADS scores between Regex and an LLM-based method (accuracy of 89.20% for Regex versus 87.69% for the LLM-based method; p=0.56). Compared to the LLM-based method, Regex processing was more efficient, completing the task 28,120 times faster (0.06 seconds vs. 1687.20 seconds). Further analysis revealed LLMs favored common classifications (particularly BI-RADS value of 2) while Regex more frequently returned "unclear" values. We also could confirm in our sample an already known laterality bias for breast cancer (BI-RADS 6) and detected a slight laterality skew for suspected breast cancer (BI-RADS 5) as well. ConclusionFor structured, standardized data like BI-RADS, traditional NLP techniques seem to be superior, though future work should explore hybrid approaches combining Regex precision for standardized elements with LLM contextual understanding for more complex information extraction tasks.