ObjectiveMagnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) is a crucial tool for diagnosing acute ischemic stroke, yet some patients present as DWI-negative. This study aims to analyze the imaging differences and associated clinical characteristics in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis, in order to enhance understanding of DWI-negative strokes. MethodsRetrospective collection of clinical data from acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis at the Stroke Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2017 to June 2023, categorized into DWI-positive and negative groups. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, binary logistic regression, and machine learning model were utilized to assess the predictive value of clinical features. Additionally, telephone follow-up was conducted for DWI-negative patients to record medication compliance, stroke recurrence, and mortality, with Fine-Gray competing risk model used to analyze recurrent risk factors. ResultsThe incidence rate of DWI-negative ischemic stroke is 22.74%. Factors positively associated with DWI-positive cases include onset to needle time (ONT), onset to first MRI time (OMT), NIHSS score at 1 week of hospitalization (NIHSS-1w), hyperlipidemia (HLP), and atrial fibrillation (AF) (p<0.05, OR>1). Conversely, recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) and platelet count (PLT) are negatively correlated with DWI-positive cases (p<0.05, OR<1). Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification significantly influences DWI presentation (p=0.01), but the specific impact of etiological subtypes remains unclear. Machine learning models suggest that the features with the highest predictive value, in descending order, are AF, HLP, OMT, ONT, NIHSS difference within 24 hours post-thrombolysis(NIHSS-d(0-24h)PT), and RIS. ConclusionsNIHSS-1w, OMT, ONT, HLP, and AF can predict DWI-positive findings, while platelet count and RIS are associated with DWI-negative cases. AF and HLP demonstrate the highest predictive value. DWI-negative patients have a higher risk of stroke recurrence than mortality in the short term, with a potential correlation between TOAST classification and recurrence risk.

BackgroundCoeliac disease, an autoimmune disorder affecting approximately 1% of the global population, is typically diagnosed on a duodenal biopsy. However, inter-pathologist agreement on coeliac disease diagnosis is only around 80%. Existing machine learning solutions designed to improve coeliac disease diagnosis often lack interpretability, which is essential for building trust and enabling widespread clinical adoption. ObjectiveTo develop an interpretable AI model capable of segmenting key histological structures in duodenal biopsies, generating explainable segmentation masks, estimating intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL)-to-enterocyte and villus-to-crypt ratios, and diagnosing coeliac disease. DesignSemantic segmentation models were trained to identify villi, crypts, IELs, and enterocytes using 49 annotated 2048x2048 patches at 40x magnification. IEL-to-enterocyte and villus-to-crypt ratios were calculated from segmentation masks, and a logistic regression model was trained on 172 images to diagnose coeliac disease based on these ratios. Evaluation was performed on an independent test set of 613 duodenal biopsy scans from a separate NHS Trust. ResultsThe villus-crypt segmentation model achieved a mean PR AUC of 80.5%, while the IEL-enterocyte model reached a PR AUC of 82%. The diagnostic model classified WSIs with 96% accuracy, 86% positive predictive value, and 98% negative predictive value on the independent test set. ConclusionsOur interpretable AI models accurately segmented key histological structures and diagnosed coeliac disease in unseen WSIs, demonstrating strong generalization performance. These models provide pathologists with reliable IEL-to-enterocyte and villus-to-crypt ratio estimates, enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Interpretable AI solutions like ours are essential for fostering trust among healthcare professionals and patients, complementing existing black-box methodologies. What is already known on this topicPathologist concordance in diagnosing coeliac disease from duodenal biopsies is consistently reported to be below 80%, highlighting diagnostic variability and the need for improved methods. Several recent studies have leveraged artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance coeliac disease diagnosis. However, most of these models operate as "black boxes," offering limited interpretability and transparency. The lack of explainability in AI-driven diagnostic tools prevents widespread adoption by healthcare professionals and reduces patient trust. What this study addsThis study presents an interpretable semantic segmentation algorithm capable of detecting the four key histological structures essential for diagnosing coeliac disease: crypts, villi, intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), and enterocytes. The model accurately estimates the IEL-to-enterocyte ratio and the villus-to-crypt ratio, the latter being an indicator of villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, thereby providing objective, reproducible metrics for diagnosis. The segmentation outputs allow for transparent, explainable decision-making, supporting pathologists in coeliac disease diagnosis with improved accuracy and confidence. This study presents an AI model that automates the estimation of the IEL-to-enterocyte ratio--a labour-intensive task currently performed manually by pathologists in limited biopsy regions. By minimising diagnostic variability and alleviating time constraints for pathologists, the model provides an efficient and practical solution to streamline the diagnostic workflow. Tested on an independent dataset from a previously unseen source, the model demonstrates explainability and generalizability, enhancing trust and encouraging adoption in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, this approach could set a new standard for AI-assisted duodenal biopsy evaluation, paving the way for the development of interpretable AI tools in pathology to address the critical challenges of limited pathologist availability and diagnostic inconsistencies.

While Deep Learning (DL) models trained on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have shown promise for prostate cancer detection, their lack of direct biological validation often undermines radiologists trust and hinders clinical adoption. Radiologic-histopathologic (rad-path) correlation has the potential to validate MRI-based lesion detection using digital histopathology. This study uses automated and manually annotated digital histopathology slides as a standard of reference to evaluate the spatial extent of lesion annotations derived from both radiologist interpretations and DL models previously trained on prostate bi-parametric MRI (bp-MRI). 117 histopathology slides were used as reference. Prospective patients with clinically significant prostate cancer performed a bp-MRI examination before undergoing a robotic radical prostatectomy, and each prostate specimen was sliced using a 3D-printed patient-specific mold to ensure a direct comparison between pre-operative imaging and histopathology slides. The histopathology slides and their corresponding T2-weighted MRI images were co-registered. We trained DL models for cancer detection on large retrospective datasets of T2-w MRI only, bp-MRI and histopathology images and did inference in a prospective patient cohort. We evaluated the spatial extent between detected lesions and between detected lesions and the histopathological and radiological ground-truth, using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The DL models trained on digital histopathology tiles and MRI images demonstrated promising capabilities in lesion detection. A low overlap was observed between the lesion detection masks generated by the histopathology and bp-MRI models, with a DSC = 0.10. However, the overlap was equivalent (DSC = 0.08) between radiologist annotations and histopathology ground truth. A rad-path correlation pipeline was established in a prospective patient cohort with prostate cancer undergoing surgery. The correlation between rad-path DL models was low but comparable to the overlap between annotations. While DL models show promise in prostate cancer detection, challenges remain in integrating MRI-based predictions with histopathological findings.

IntroductionExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods enhance the diagnostic efficiency of clinical decision support systems by making the predictions of a convolutional neural networks (CNN) on brain imaging more transparent and trustworthy. However, their clinical adoption is limited due to limited validation of the explanation quality. Our study introduces a framework that evaluates XAI methods by integrating neuroanatomical morphological features with CNN-generated relevance maps for disease classification. MethodsWe trained a CNN using brain MRI scans from six cohorts: ADNI, AIBL, DELCODE, DESCRIBE, EDSD, and NIFD (N=3253), including participants that were cognitively normal, with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, dementia due to Alzheimers disease and frontotemporal dementia. Clustering analysis benchmarked different explanation space configurations by using morphological features as proxy-ground truth. We implemented three post-hoc explanations methods: i) by simplifying model decisions, ii) explanation-by-example, and iii) textual explanations. A qualitative evaluation by clinicians (N=6) was performed to assess their clinical validity. ResultsClustering performance improved in morphology enriched explanation spaces, improving both homogeneity and completeness of the clusters. Post hoc explanations by model simplification largely delineated converters and stable participants, while explanation-by-example presented possible cognition trajectories. Textual explanations gave rule-based summarization of pathological findings. Clinicians qualitative evaluation highlighted challenges and opportunities of XAI for different clinical applications. ConclusionOur study refines XAI explanation spaces and applies various approaches for generating explanations. Within the context of AI-based decision support system in dementia research we found the explanations methods to be promising towards enhancing diagnostic efficiency, backed up by the clinical assessments.

BackgroundOsteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated prompting the exploration of opportunistic screening using CT and artificial intelligence (AI). PurposeTo develop a reproducible deep learning-based convolutional neural network to automatically place a 3D region of interest (ROI) in trabecular bone, develop a correction method to normalize attenuation across different CT protocols or and scanner models, and to establish thresholds for osteoporosis in a large diverse population. MethodsA deep learning-based method was developed to automatically quantify trabecular attenuation using a 3D ROI of the thoracic and lumbar spine on chest, abdomen, or spine CTs, adjusted for different tube voltages and scanner models. Normative values, thresholds for osteoporosis of trabecular attenuation of the spine were established across a diverse population, stratified by age, sex, race, and ethnicity using reported prevalence of osteoporosis by the WHO. Results538,946 CT examinations from 283,499 patients (mean age 65 years{+/-}15, 51.2% women and 55.5% White), performed on 50 scanner models using six different tube voltages were analyzed. Hounsfield Units at 80 kVp versus 120 kVp differed by 23%, and different scanner models resulted in differences of values by < 10%. Automated ROI placement of 1496 vertebra was validated by manual radiologist review, demonstrating >99% agreement. Mean trabecular attenuation was higher in young women (<50 years) than young men (p<.001) and decreased with age, with a steeper decline in postmenopausal women. In patients older than 50 years, trabecular attention was higher in males than females (p<.001). Trabecular attenuation was highest in Blacks, followed by Asians and lowest in Whites (p<.001). The threshold for L1 in diagnosing osteoporosis was 80 HU. ConclusionDeep learning-based automated opportunistic osteoporosis screening can identify patients with low bone mineral density that undergo CT scans for clinical purposes on different scanners and protocols. Key Results 3 main results/conclusionsO_LIIn a study of 538,946 CT examinations performed in 283,499 patients using different scanner models and imaging protocols, an automated deep learning-based convolutional neural network was able to accurately place a three-dimensional regions of interest within thoracic and lumbar vertebra to measure trabecular attenuation. C_LIO_LITube voltage had a larger influence on attenuation values (23%) than scanner model (<10%). C_LIO_LIA threshold of 80 HU was identified for L1 to diagnose osteoporosis using an automated three-dimensional region of interest. C_LI

This study explores Artificial Intelligence (AI)s transformative role in diabetes care and monitoring, focusing on innovations that optimize patient outcomes. AI, particularly machine learning and deep learning, significantly enhances early detection of complications like diabetic retinopathy and improves screening efficacy. The methodology employs a bibliometric analysis using Scopus, VOSviewer, and Publish or Perish, analyzing 235 articles from 2023-2025. Results indicate a strong interdisciplinary focus, with Computer Science and Medicine being dominant subject areas (36.9% and 12.9% respectively). Bibliographic coupling reveals robust international collaborations led by the U.S. (1558.52 link strength), UK, and China, with key influential documents by Zhu (2023c) and Annuzzi (2023). This research highlights AIs impact on enhancing monitoring, personalized treatment, and proactive care, while acknowledging challenges in data privacy and ethical deployment. Future work should bridge technological advancements with real-world implementation to create equitable and efficient diabetes care systems.

BackgroundDelays in the diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) contribute to the significant morbidity of the condition, especially in the era of disease-modifying therapies. Screening for ATTR-CM with AI and other algorithms may improve timely diagnosis, but these algorithms have not been directly compared. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the performance of four algorithms for ATTR-CM detection in a heart failure population and assess the risk for harms due to model bias. MethodsWe identified patients in an integrated health system from 2010-2022 with ATTR-CM and age- and sex-matched them to controls with heart failure to target 5% prevalence. We compared the performance of a claims-based random forest model (Huda et al. model), a regression-based score (Mayo ATTR-CM), and two deep learning echo models (EchoNet-LVH and EchoGo(R) Amyloidosis). We evaluated for bias using standard fairness metrics. ResultsThe analytical cohort included 176 confirmed cases of ATTR-CM and 3192 control patients with 79.2% self-identified as White and 9.0% as Black. The Huda et al. model performed poorly (AUC 0.49). Both deep learning echo models had a higher AUC when compared to the Mayo ATTR-CM Score (EchoNet-LVH 0.88; EchoGo Amyloidosis 0.92; Mayo ATTR-CM Score 0.79; DeLong P<0.001 for both). Bias auditing met fairness criteria for equal opportunity among patients who identified as Black. ConclusionsDeep learning, echo-based models to detect ATTR-CM demonstrated best overall discrimination when compared to two other models in external validation with low risk of harms due to racial bias.

The scarcity and imbalance of medical image datasets hinder the development of robust computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer. This study explores the application of advanced generative models, based on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), for the synthesis of digital breast ultrasound images. Using a hybrid Conditional Variational Autoencoder-Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (CVAE-WGAN) architecture, we developed a system to generate high-quality synthetic images conditioned on the class (malignant vs. normal/benign). These synthetic images, generated from the low-resolution BreastMNIST dataset and filtered for quality, were systematically integrated with real training data at different mixing ratios (W). The performance of a CNN classifier trained on these mixed datasets was evaluated against a baseline model trained only on real data balanced with SMOTE. The optimal integration (mixing weight W=0.25) produced a significant performance increase on the real test set: +8.17% in macro-average F1-score and +4.58% in accuracy compared to using real data alone. Analysis confirmed the originality of the generated samples. This approach offers a promising solution for overcoming data limitations in image-based breast cancer diagnostics, potentially improving the capabilities of CAD systems.

BackgroundDifferent Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques have demonstrated promising results for data extraction from radiological reports. Both traditional rule-based methods like regular expressions (Regex) and modern Large Language Models (LLMs) can extract structured information. However, comparison between these approaches for extraction of specific radiological data elements has not been widely conducted. MethodsWe compared accuracy and processing time between Regex and LLM-based approaches for extracting BI-RADS scores from 7,764 radiology reports (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and biopsy). We developed a rule-based algorithm using Regex patterns and implemented an LLM-based extraction using the Rombos-LLM-V2.6-Qwen-14b model. A ground truth dataset of 199 manually classified reports was used for evaluation. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy in extracting BI-RADS scores between Regex and an LLM-based method (accuracy of 89.20% for Regex versus 87.69% for the LLM-based method; p=0.56). Compared to the LLM-based method, Regex processing was more efficient, completing the task 28,120 times faster (0.06 seconds vs. 1687.20 seconds). Further analysis revealed LLMs favored common classifications (particularly BI-RADS value of 2) while Regex more frequently returned "unclear" values. We also could confirm in our sample an already known laterality bias for breast cancer (BI-RADS 6) and detected a slight laterality skew for suspected breast cancer (BI-RADS 5) as well. ConclusionFor structured, standardized data like BI-RADS, traditional NLP techniques seem to be superior, though future work should explore hybrid approaches combining Regex precision for standardized elements with LLM contextual understanding for more complex information extraction tasks.

A diagnostic medical foundation model (MedFM) is an artificial intelligence (AI) system engineered to accurately determine diagnoses across various medical imaging modalities and specialties. To train MedFM, we created the PubMed Central Medical Images Dataset (PMCMID), the largest annotated medical image dataset to date, comprising 16,126,659 images from 3,021,780 medical publications. Using AI- and ontology-based methods, we identified 4,482,237 medical images (e.g., clinical photos, X-rays, ultrasounds) and generated comprehensive annotations. To optimize MedFMs performance and assess biases, 13,266 images were manually annotated to establish a multimodal benchmark. MedFM achieved physician-level performance in diagnosis tasks spanning radiology, dermatology, and infectious diseases without requiring specific training. Additionally, we developed the Image2Paper app, allowing clinicians to upload medical images and retrieve relevant literature. The correct diagnoses appeared within the top ten results in 88.4% and at least one relevant differential diagnosis in 93.0%. MedFM and PMCMID were made publicly available. FundingResearch reported here was partially supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (R01 CA260271), the Saudi Company for Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Authority, and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) under the project DAKI-FWS (01MK21009E). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.