Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has emerged as a state-of-the-art treatment option for multiple tumour entities, accounting for daily anatomical and tumour volume changes, thus allowing sparing of relevant organs at risk (OARs). However, the annotation of treatment-relevant anatomical structures in context of online plan adaptation remains challenging, often relying on commercial segmentation solutions due to limited availability of clinically validated alternatives. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an open-source artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation network can compete with the annotation accuracy of a commercial solution, both trained on the identical dataset, questioning the need for commercial models in clinical practice. For 47 pelvic patients, T2w MR imaging data acquired on a 1.5 T MR-Linac were manually contoured, identifying prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, anal canal, bladder, penile bulb, and bony structures. These training data were used for the generation of an in-house AI segmentation model, a nnU-Net with residual encoder architecture featuring a streamlined single image inference pipeline, and re-training of a commercial solution. For quantitative evaluation, 20 MR images were contoured by a radiation oncologist, considered as ground truth contours (GTC) and compared with the in-house/commercial AI-based contours (iAIC/cAIC) using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distances (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC). For qualitative evaluation, four radiation oncologists assessed the usability of OAR/target iAIC within an online adaptive workflow using a four-point Likert scale: (1) acceptable without modification, (2) requiring minor adjustments, (3) requiring major adjustments, and (4) not usable. Patient-individual annotations were generated in a median [range] time of 23 [16-34] s for iAIC and 152 [121-198] s for cAIC, respectively. OARs showed a maximum median DSC of 0.97/0.97 (iAIC/cAIC) for bladder and minimum median DSC of 0.78/0.79 (iAIC/cAIC) for anal canal/penile bulb. Maximal respectively minimal median HD95 were detected for rectum with 17.3/20.6 mm (iAIC/cAIC) and for bladder with 5.6/6.0 mm (iAIC/cAIC). Overall, the average median DSC/HD95 values were 0.87/11.8mm (iAIC) and 0.83/10.2mm (cAIC) for OAR/targets and 0.90/11.9mm (iAIC) and 0.91/16.5mm (cAIC) for bony structures. For a tolerance of 3 mm, the highest and lowest sDSC were determined for bladder (iAIC:1.00, cAIC:0.99) and prostate in iAIC (0.89) and anal canal in cAIC (0.80), respectively. Qualitatively, 84.8% of analysed contours were considered as clinically acceptable for iAIC, while 12.9% required minor and 2.3% major adjustments or were classed as unusable. Contour-specific analysis showed that iAIC achieved the highest mean scores with 1.00 for the anal canal and the lowest with 1.61 for the prostate. This study demonstrates that open-source segmentation framework can achieve comparable annotation accuracy to commercial solutions for pelvic anatomy in online adaptive MRgRT. The adapted framework not only maintained high segmentation performance, with 84.8% of contours accepted by physicians or requiring only minor corrections (12.9%) but also enhanced clinical workflow efficiency of online adaptive MRgRT through reduced inference times. These findings establish open-source frameworks as viable alternatives to commercial systems in supervised clinical workflows.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival rates. However, OS heterogeneity results in variable treatment responses, highlighting the need for reliable, non-invasive tools to predict NAC response. Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) offers potential for identifying imaging biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the accuracy and reliability of radiomics models for predicting NAC response in OS. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2024. Studies using radiomics-based ML for NAC response prediction in OS were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for training and validation cohorts were calculated using bivariate random-effects modeling, with clinical-combined models analyzed separately. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool, radiomics quality score (RQS), and METRICS scores. Sixteen studies were included, with 63 % using MRI and 37 % using CT. Twelve studies, comprising 1639 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled metrics for training cohorts showed an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.89, and specificity of 0.85. Validation cohorts achieved an AUC of 0.87, sensitivity of 0.81, and specificity of 0.82. Clinical-combined models outperformed radiomics-only models. The mean RQS score was 9.44 ± 3.41, and the mean METRICS score was 60.8 % ± 17.4 %. Radiomics-based ML shows promise for predicting NAC response in OS, especially when combined with clinical indicators. However, limitations in external validation and methodological consistency must be addressed.

Pneumonia is the leading cause of hospitalisation and mortality among children under five, particularly in low-resource settings. Accurate differentiation between viral and bacterial pneumonia is essential for guiding appropriate treatment, yet it remains challenging due to overlapping clinical and radiographic features. Advances in machine learning (ML), particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in classifying pneumonia using chest X-ray (CXR) images. This scoping review summarises the evidence on ML techniques for classifying viral and bacterial pneumonia using CXR images in paediatric patients. This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies involving children (0-18 years) with pneumonia diagnosed through CXR, using ML models for binary or multiclass classification. Data extraction included ML models, dataset characteristics, and performance metrics. A total of 35 studies, published between 2018 and 2025, were included in this review. Of these, 31 studies used the publicly available Kermany dataset, raising concerns about overfitting and limited generalisability to broader, real-world clinical populations. Most studies (n=33) used convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for pneumonia classification. While many models demonstrated promising performance, significant variability was observed due to differences in methodologies, dataset sizes, and validation strategies, complicating direct comparisons. For binary classification (viral vs bacterial pneumonia), a median accuracy of 92.3% (range: 80.8% to 97.9%) was reported. For multiclass classification (healthy, viral pneumonia, and bacterial pneumonia), the median accuracy was 91.8% (range: 76.8% to 99.7%). Current evidence is constrained by a predominant reliance on a single dataset and variability in methodologies, which limit the generalisability and clinical applicability of findings. To address these limitations, future research should focus on developing diverse and representative datasets while adhering to standardised reporting guidelines. Such efforts are essential to improve the reliability, reproducibility, and translational potential of machine learning models in clinical settings.

Accurate preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer is crucial for guiding treatment decisions. This study aimed to develop a deep-learning radiomics model for assessing ALNM and to evaluate its impact on radiologists' diagnostic accuracy. This multicenter study included 866 breast cancer patients from 6 hospitals. The data were categorized into training, internal test, external test, and prospective test sets. Deep learning and handcrafted radiomics features were extracted from ultrasound images of primary tumors and lymph nodes. The tumor score and LN score were calculated following feature selection, and a clinical-radiomics model was constructed based on these scores along with clinical-ultrasonic risk factors. The model's performance was validated across the 3 test sets. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of radiologists, with and without model assistance, was evaluated. The clinical-radiomics model demonstrated robust discrimination with AUCs of 0.94, 0.92, 0.91, and 0.95 in the training, internal test, external test, and prospective test sets, respectively. It surpassed the clinical model and single score in all sets (P < .05). Decision curve analysis and clinical impact curves validated the clinical utility of the clinical-radiomics model. Moreover, the model significantly improved radiologists' diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs increasing from 0.71 to 0.82 for the junior radiologist and from 0.75 to 0.85 for the senior radiologist. The clinical-radiomics model effectively predicts ALNM in breast cancer patients using noninvasive ultrasound features. Additionally, it enhances radiologists' diagnostic accuracy, potentially optimizing resource allocation in breast cancer management.

To perform a systematic review on artificial intelligence (AI) studies focused on identifying and differentiating pelvic gynecological tumors on ultrasound scans. Studies developing or validating AI models for diagnosing gynecological pelvic tumors on ultrasound scans were eligible for inclusion. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from their database inception until April 30th, 2024. To assess the quality of the included studies, we adapted the QUADAS-2 risk of bias tool to address the unique challenges of AI in medical imaging. Using multi-level random effects models, we performed a meta-analysis to generate summary estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. To provide a reference point of current diagnostic support tools for ultrasound examiners, we descriptively compared the pooled performance to that of the well-recognized ADNEX model on external validation. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. From 9151 records retrieved, 44 studies were eligible: 40 on ovarian, three on endometrial, and one on myometrial pathology. Overall, 95% were at high risk of bias - primarily due to inappropriate study inclusion criteria, the absence of a patient-level split of training and testing image sets, and no calibration assessment. For ovarian tumors, the summary AUC for AI models distinguishing benign from malignant tumors was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). In lower-risk studies (at least three low-risk domains), the summary AUC dropped to 0.87 (0.83-0.90), with deep learning models outperforming radiomics-based machine learning approaches in this subset. Only five studies included an external validation, and six evaluated calibration performance. In a recent systematic review of external validation studies, the ADNEX model had a pooled AUC of 0.93 (0.91-0.94) in studies at low risk of bias. Studies on endometrial and myometrial pathologies were reported individually. Although AI models show promising discriminative performances for diagnosing gynecological tumors on ultrasound, most studies have methodological shortcomings that result in a high risk of bias. In addition, the ADNEX model appears to outperform most AI approaches for ovarian tumors. Future research should emphasize robust study designs - ideally large, multicenter, and prospective cohorts that mirror real-world populations - along with external validation, proper calibration, and standardized reporting. This study was pre-registered with Open Science Framework (OSF): https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/bhkst.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to identify post-operative risk factors for re-tearing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a combination of imaging signal intensity (SI) and cross-sectional area measurements of the healing ACL. During surgery micro-debris can result from drilling the osseous tunnels for graft and/or suture insertion. The debris presents a limitation when using post-surgical MRI to assess reinjury risk as it causes rapid magnetic field variations during acquisition, leading to signal loss within a voxel. The present study demonstrates how K-means clustering can refine an automatic segmentation algorithm to remove the lost signal intensity values induced by the artifacts in the image. MRI data were obtained from 82 patients enrolled in three prospective clinical trials of ACL surgery. Constructive Interference in Steady State MRIs were collected at 6 months post-operation. Manual segmentation of the ACL with metallic artifacts removed served as the gold standard. The accuracy of the automatic ACL segmentations was compared using Dice coefficient, sensitivity, and precision. The performance of the automatic segmentation was comparable to manual segmentation (Dice coefficient = .81, precision = .81, sensitivity = .82). The normalized average signal intensity was calculated as 1.06 (±0.25) for the automatic and 1.04 (±0.23) for the manual segmentation, yielding a difference of 2%. These metrics emphasize the automatic segmentation model's ability to precisely capture ACL signal intensity while excluding artifact regions. The automatic artifact segmentation model described here could enhance qMRI's clinical utility by allowing for more accurate and time-efficient segmentations of the ACL.

Previous resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) analyses of the basal ganglia in Parkinson's disease heavily relied on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) atlases. However, subcortical structures are characterized by subtle contrast differences, making their accurate delineation challenging on T1WI. In this study, we aimed to introduce and validate a method that incorporates quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) into the rs-fMRI analytical pipeline to achieve precise subcortical nuclei segmentation and improve the stability of RSFC measurements in Parkinson's disease. A total of 321 participants (148 patients with Parkinson's Disease and 173 normal controls) were enrolled. We performed cross-modal registration at the individual level for rs-fMRI to QSM (FUNC2QSM) and T1WI (FUNC2T1), respectively.The consistency and accuracy of resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) measurements in two registration approaches were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient and mutual information. Bootstrap analysis was performed to validate the stability of the RSFC differences between Parkinson's disease and normal controls. RSFC-based machine learning models were constructed for Parkinson's disease classification, using optimized hyperparameters (RandomizedSearchCV with 5-fold cross-validation). The consistency of RSFC measurements between the two registration methods was poor, whereas the QSM-guided approach showed better mutual information values, suggesting higher registration accuracy. The disruptions of RSFC identified with the QSM-guided approach were more stable and reliable, as confirmed by bootstrap analysis. In classification models, the QSM-guided method consistently outperformed the T1WI-guided method, achieving higher test-set ROC-AUC values (FUNC2QSM: 0.87-0.90, FUNC2T1: 0.67-0.70). The QSM-guided approach effectively enhanced the accuracy of subcortical segmentation and the stability of RSFC measurement, thus facilitating future biomarker development in Parkinson's disease.

Cardiac perfusion PET is commonly used to assess ischemia and cardiovascular risk, which enables quantitative measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF) through kinetic modeling. However, the estimation of kinetic parameters is challenging due to the noisy nature of short dynamic frames and limited sample data points. This work aimed to investigate the errors in MBF estimation in PET through a simulation study and to evaluate different parameter estimation approaches, including a deep learning (DL) method. Simulated studies were generated using digital phantoms based on cardiac segmentations from 55 clinical CT images. We employed the irreversible 2-tissue compartmental model and simulated dynamic ¹³N-ammonia PET scans under both rest and stress conditions (220 cases each). The simulations covered a rest K₁ range of 0.6 to 1.2 and a stress K₁ range of 1.2 to 3.6 (unit: mL/min/g) in the myocardium. A transformer-based DL model was trained on the simulated dataset to predict parametric images (PIMs) from noisy PET image frames and was validated using 5-fold cross-validation. We compared the DL method with the voxel-wise nonlinear least squares (NLS) fitting applied to the dynamic images, using either Gaussian filter (GF) smoothing (GF-NLS) or a dynamic nonlocal means (DNLM) algorithm for denoising (DNLM-NLS). Two patients with coronary CT angiography (CTA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were enrolled to test the feasibility of applying DL models on clinical PET data. The DL method showed clearer image structures with reduced noise compared to the traditional NLS-based methods. In terms of mean absolute relative error (MARE), as the rest K₁ values increased from 0.6 to 1.2 mL/min/g, the overall bias in myocardium K₁ estimates decreased from approximately 58% to 45% for the NLS-based methods while the DL method showed a reduction in MARE from 42% to 18%. For stress data, as the stress K₁ decreased from 3.6 to 1.2 mL/min/g, the MARE increased from 30% to 70% for the GF-NLS method. In contrast, both the DNLM-NLS (average: 42%) and the DL methods (average: 20%) demonstrated significantly smaller MARE changes as stress K₁ varied. Regarding the regional mean bias (±standard deviation), the GF-NLS method had a bias of 6.30% (±8.35%) of rest K₁, compared to 1.10% (±8.21%) for DNLM-NLS and 6.28% (±14.05%) for the DL method. For the stress K₁, the GF-NLS showed a mean bias of 10.72% (±9.34%) compared to 1.69% (±8.82%) for DNLM-NLS and -10.55% (±9.81%) for the DL method. This study showed that an increase in the tracer uptake rate (K₁) corresponded to improved accuracy and precision in MBF quantification, whereas lower tracer uptake resulted in higher noise in dynamic PET and poorer parameter estimates. Utilizing denoising techniques or DL approaches can mitigate noise-induced bias in PET parametric imaging.

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods for the analysis of CT (computed tomography) images has greatly contributed to the development of an effective computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system for lung cancer (LC). However, complex structures, multiple radiographic interrelations, and the dynamic locations of abnormalities within lung CT images make extracting relevant information to process and implement LC CAD systems difficult. These prominent problems are addressed in this paper by presenting a hybrid method of LC malignancy classification, which may help researchers and experts properly engineer the model's performance by observing how the model makes decisions. The proposed methodology is named IncCat-LCC: Explainer (Inception Net Cat Boost LC Classification: Explainer), which consists of feature extraction (FE) using the handcrafted radiomic Feature (HcRdF) extraction technique, InceptionNet CNN Feature (INCF) extraction, Vision Transformer Feature (ViTF) extraction, and XGBOOST (XGB)-based feature selection, and the GPU based CATBOOST (CB) classification technique. The proposed framework achieves better and highest performance scores for lung nodule multiclass malignancy classification when evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, f-1 score, specificity, and area under the roc curve as 96.74 %, 93.68 %, 96.74 %, 95.19 %, 98.47 % and 99.76 % consecutively for classifying highly normal class. Observing the explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) explanations will help readers understand the model performance and the statistical outcomes of the evaluation parameter. The work presented in this article may improve the existing LC CAD system and help assess the important parameters using XAI to recognize the factors contributing to enhanced performance and reliability.

In abdominal interventional procedures, achieving precise registration of 2D ultrasound (US) frames with 3D computed tomography (CT) scans presents a significant challenge. Traditional tracking methods often rely on high-precision sensors, which can be prohibitively expensive. Furthermore, the clinical need for real-time registration with a broad capture range frequently exceeds the performance of standard image-based optimization techniques. Current automatic registration methods that utilize deep learning are either heavily reliant on manual annotations for training or struggle to effectively bridge the gap between different imaging domains. To address these challenges, we propose a novel diffusion-stimulated CT-US registration model. This model harnesses the physical diffusion properties of US to generate synthetic US images from preoperative CT data. Additionally, we introduce a synthetic-to-real domain adaptation strategy using a diffusion model to mitigate the discrepancies between real and synthetic US images. A dual-stream self-supervised regression neural network, trained on these synthetic images, is then used to estimate the pose within the CT space. The effectiveness of our proposed approach is verified through validation using US and CT scans from a dual-modality human abdominal phantom. The results of our experiments confirm that our method can accurately initialize the US image pose within an acceptable range of error and subsequently refine it to achieve precise alignment. This enables real-time, tracker-independent, and robust rigid registration of CT and US images.