Validation of a Deep-Learning Coregistration Framework for Long-Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Using Low-Radiation-Exposure Protocols Across Various Tracers.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected].
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Biomedical Photonic Imaging, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; and.
- Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Abstract
The advent of long-axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems has significantly improved whole-body imaging by providing higher sensitivity and extended torso coverage. However, PET/CT potential misalignment remains a challenge, potentially introducing artifacts and quantification errors. Moreover, PET protocols with reduced scanning duration and dose, as well as the use of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT), are increasingly relevant in clinical practice and research. This study aimed to evaluate the robustness and generalizability of a deep-learning coregistration framework for PET/CT alignment using low-dose PET and ULD-CT across various tracers with a LAFOV system. <b>Methods:</b> In total, 63 scans with 4 different tracers (<sup>89</sup>Zr-trastuzumab, <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O, <sup>18</sup>F-MC225, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG) were included to assess PET and CT alignment improvements. Further evaluation was performed by comparing CT scans coregistered to the original PET images (rCT) with those coregistered to low-count (50%, 25%, and 12.5% of original counts) PET images (LC-rCT). Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and average surface distance were used as evaluation metrics. Furthermore, ULD-CT coregistered to PET (rULD-CT) was compared with low-dose CT coregistered to the same PET (rLD-CT) using the same metrics. PET accuracy was evaluated by calculating SUVs. <b>Results:</b> The robustness of the deep-learning coregistration framework was demonstrated in reduced PET counts and ULD-CT scenarios across tracers. All metrics indicated robust performance when comparing LC-rCT with rCT and rULD-CT with rLD-CT. Consistent SUVs across varying PET counts and ULD-CT conditions further validated the quantitative accuracy of the approach. <b>Conclusion:</b> This work highlights that neither the use of low-dose PET protocols nor ULD-CT compromise the performance of this coregistration framework across 4 tracers. For LAFOV PET, these findings support the feasibility of such a framework in imaging protocols with reduced radiation exposure.