Objective assessment of diagnostic image quality in CT scans: what radiologists and researchers need to know.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. [email protected].
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. [email protected].
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Quantifying diagnostic image quality (IQ) is not straightforward but essential for optimizing the balance between IQ and radiation dose, and for ensuring consistent high-quality images in CT imaging. This review provides a comprehensive overview of advanced objective reference-free IQ assessment methods for CT scans, beyond standard approaches. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science up to June 2024 to identify studies using advanced objective image quality methods on clinical CT scans. Only reference-free methods, which do not require a predefined reference image, were included. Traditional methods relying on the standard deviation of the Hounsfield units, the signal-to-noise ratio or contrast-to-noise ratio, all within a manually selected region-of-interest, were excluded. Eligible results were categorized by IQ metric (i.e., noise, contrast, spatial resolution and other) and assessment method (manual, automated, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based). Thirty-five studies were included that proposed or employed reference-free IQ methods, identifying 12 noise assessment methods, 4 contrast assessment methods, 14 spatial resolution assessment methods and 7 others, based on manual, automated or AI-based approaches. This review emphasizes the transition from manual to fully automated approaches for IQ assessment, including the potential of AI-based methods, and it provides a reference tool for researchers and radiologists who need to make a well-considered choice in how to evaluate IQ in CT imaging. This review examines the challenge of quantifying diagnostic CT image quality, essential for optimization studies and ensuring consistent high-quality images, by providing an overview of objective reference-free diagnostic image quality assessment methods beyond standard methods. Quantifying diagnostic CT image quality remains a key challenge. This review summarizes objective diagnostic image quality assessment techniques beyond standard metrics. A decision tree is provided to help select optimal image quality assessment techniques.