An Artificial Intelligence Model Using Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Metrics Accurately Predicts Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Authors
Affiliations (8)
Affiliations (8)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada.
- Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada.
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
- Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
- Kaiser Permanente, The Permanente Medical Group, Walnut Creek, California.
- AdventHealth Cancer Institute, AdventHealth Medical Group, Orlando, Florida.
- Prostatype Genomics, Solna, Sweden.
Abstract
Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) before biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa. Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences before prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI metrics as input classifiers and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density [PSAD], and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score <u>></u> 7. The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.52-2.73, <i>P</i> < .01), as were PSAD (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.21-3.35, <i>P</i> = .01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, <i>P</i> = .01; OR 9.67, 95% CI 2.89-32.7 for PI-RADS 4-5, <i>P</i> < .01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSAD + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs 0.859, <i>P</i> = .89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, <i>P</i> < .01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared with biopsy for all). Our DBSI-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.