Back to all papers

Applying machine-learning and deep-learning to predict depression from brain MRI and identify depression-related brain biology.

February 25, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Jiang JC,Brianceau C,Delzant E,Colle R,Bottemanne H,Corruble E,Wray NR,Colliot O,Shah S,Couvy-Duchesne B

Affiliations (8)

  • Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. [email protected].
  • Sorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute - ICM, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, F-75013, Paris, France.
  • Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie de Bicêtre, Mood Center Paris Saclay, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94275, France.
  • MOODS Team, INSERM 1018, CESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations), Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94275, France.
  • Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Brain & Mental Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Abstract

The accuracy of grey-matter predictors of depression has remained limited. In this study, brain-based predictors of major depressive disorder (MDD) were trained using machine-learning (Best Linear Unbiased Predictors [BLUP]) and deep-learning (ResNet3D) techniques applied to high-dimensional (voxel-wise) grey-matter structure extracted from T1-weighted structural MRI. The training sample comprised 987 MDD cases and 3934 controls from the UK Biobank. Predictors were evaluated in an independent sub-cohort of 483 MDD cases and 1939 controls from the UK Biobank and replicated in a clinical cohort (DEP-ARREST CLIN) of 64 cases and 32 controls. In the UK Biobank, the BLUP predictor showed a significant association with MDD status (AUC = 0.57; OR = 1.28 [1.15-1.43]; p-value = 1.1×10<sup>-5</sup>), which was confirmed in both males and females. By partitioning the BLUP predictor by brain regions of interest (ROI), we found nominal significance supporting the contribution of previously identified MDD-related ROIs (e.g. hippocampus and amygdala), though none passed multiple testing correction. The BLUP predictor overlapped partially with a polygenic score (PGS) of major depression (AUC = 0.65) but also captured a nominally significant signal that was not captured by the genetic score (combined AUC = 0.66, p-value = 0.024 when compared to PGS alone). No association passed multiple testing correction in the DEP-ARREST CLIN cohort, likely due to the small sample size. In contrast, the deep-learning predictor was not associated with MDD after multiple testing corrections. We estimated the morphometricity of MDD to be 0.061, implying limited potential of a brain-based predictor based on grey-matter structure (maximal AUC = 0.64). While the modest AUC values reiterate the challenge of developing brain-based MDD predictors for clinical applications, our predictors inform future research to explore brain-based relationships between MDD and comorbidities.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.