Predicting first-trimester pregnancy outcome in threatened miscarriage: A comparison of a multivariate logistic regression and machine learning models.
Authors
Affiliations (6)
Affiliations (6)
- Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Malta. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Malta. Electronic address: [email protected].
- College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Malta. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract
Threatened miscarriage (TM), defined as first-trimester vaginal bleeding with a closed cervix and detectable fetal cardiac activity, affects up to 30 % of clinically recognised pregnancies and is linked to increased risk of adverse outcomes. This study evaluates the predictive value of first-trimester ultrasound (US) and biochemical (BC) markers in determining outcomes among women with TM symptoms. This prospective cohort study recruited 118 women with viable singleton pregnancies (5<sup>+0</sup> to 12<sup>+6</sup> weeks' gestation) from Malta's national public hospital between January 2023 and June 2024. Participants underwent US and BC assessment, along with collection of clinical and sociodemographic data. Pregnancy outcomes were followed to term and classified as live birth or loss. Univariate logistic regression identified individual predictors. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) modelling assessed combined predictive performance. Among 118 TM cases, 77 % resulted in live birth, 23 % in loss. MLR identified progesterone, cervical length, mean gestational sac diameter (MGSD), trophoblast thickness, sFlt-1:PlGF ratio, and maternal age as significant predictors. Higher progesterone, cervical length, MGSD, and sFlt-1:PlGF ratio reduced risk, while maternal age over 35 increased it. MLR achieved 82.7 % accuracy (AUC = 0.89). RF improved accuracy to 93.1 % (AUC = 0.97), confirming the combined predictive value of US and BC markers. US and BC markers hold predictive value in TM. Machine learning, particularly RF, may improve early clinical risk stratification. This tool may support timely decision-making and personalised monitoring, intervention, and counselling for women with TM.