Back to all papers

Automated Detection of Middle Mesial Canals in Mandibular Molars on CBCT Using nnU-Net: A Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

March 26, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Turp ŞS,Er K,Çakmak YE,Varol N,Yilmaz SG

Affiliations (3)

  • Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey.

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a fully three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) for automated detection of the mid-mesial canal (MMC) in mandibular molars on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, 248 CBCT volumes were used for model development, with an independent test set of 28 cases (1.611 axial slices). Ground-truth MMC status was defined by endodontist-radiologist consensus; multi-class manual masks (dentin, mesiobuccal-, mesiolingual-, mid-mesial-canal) were created in 3D Slicer. A 3D nnU-Net-based model was trained using canal-focused patch sampling and a combined Dice plus weighted cross-entropy loss. MMC detection was evaluated at slice and case levels using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV/NPV, and Cohen's κ; paired comparisons used McNemar's test. Interobserver agreement for slice-level MMC labeling was excellent (κ = 0.892). For case-level MMC detection using a prespecified threshold (≥5 AI-positive slices), performance was sensitivity 94.7%, specificity 100%, accuracy 96.4%, and κ = 0.920. At slice level, agreement remained high versus individual observers (κ ≈ 0.80) and consensus references (κ = 0.812 for OR; κ = 0.792 for AND). No significant difference was observed between AI and the OR-consensus reference at slice level, nor between AI and the case-level ground truth. A fully 3D nnU-Net framework achieved clinician-level MMC detection on CBCT and may support standardized, efficient identification of this frequently overlooked anatomical variation.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.