Back to all papers

Fully automated Res3DNet model to predict IDH mutation of gliomas from whole-brain MRI free of tumor segmentation.

January 16, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Zhu Z,Liu Y,Song Y,Zhou J,Chen S,Ye M,Zhang Z,Lu J,Li X,Xu X,Long C,Fu L,Zhu Y,Yang X,Li W,Bai Y,Du S,Yang H,Zhang X,Li WJ,Zhang B

Affiliations (7)

  • Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China.
  • National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Department of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China.
  • Center of Medical Big Data, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China.
  • National Institute of Healthcare Data Science at Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China.
  • Medical Imaging Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China.
  • Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of IDH mutation status in gliomas is critical for guiding diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning. We enrolled 2,537 preoperative MRI of glioma patients (mean age 55.91 ± 14.79, 1,063 females) from 11 different datasets, consisting of 1,382 patients (mean age 58.26 ± 14.38, 548 females) in training set, 346 patients (mean age 57.43 ± 14.04, 141 females) in internal validation set, and 809 patients (mean age 53.92 ± 14.04, 374 females) in external test set, including 242 patients from The Cancer Genome Archive (TCGA) dataset. A fully automated Res3DNet model was established for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene prediction. Four radiologists also read images from TCGA test dataset as a comparison with the deep learning model. Our Res3DNet model achieved AUCs of 0.946 (internal validation), 0.872 (external test), and 0.912 (TCGA test), with corresponding accuracies of 0.925, 0.806, and 0.840, respectively, outperforming ResNet model, I3D model, transformer model, and four radiologists.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 8,400+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.