Machine Learning on Dynamic Functional Connectivity: Promise, Pitfalls, and Interpretations.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.
- School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, 27157, North Carolina, USA.
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.
- UNC NeuroScience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
An unprecedented amount of existing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data provides a new opportunity to understand how functional fluctuations relate to human cognition/behavior using data-driven approaches. To this end, tremendous efforts have been made in machine learning to decode cognitive states from evolving volumetric images of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals. However, due to the complex nature of brain function, the performance and findings of current deep learning models remain inconsistent across tasks, datasets, and evaluation settings. In this work, by capitalizing on large-scale existing neuroimaging data (39,784 fMRI samples from seven databases), we seek to establish a well-founded empirical guideline for designing deep models in functional neuroimaging by linking the methodology underpinning with neuroscientific understanding. Specifically, we put the spotlight on (1) What is the performance landscape of various models in cognitive task recognition and disease diagnosis? (2) What are the key limitations and trade-offs of current deep models? and (3) What is the general guideline for selecting the suitable machine learning backbone for specific neuroimaging applications? We have conducted comprehensive evaluations and statistical analysis across cognitive and clinical scenarios, to answer the above outstanding questions. Our findings demonstrate that no universal model dominates all scenarios; instead, model effectiveness depends on factors such as demographics, task type, and disease stage. Furthermore, we introduce an attention-based interpretability method to reveal spatial patterns of brain activation associated with tasks and disorders.