Back to all papers

Clinical Readiness of Artificial Intelligence Models for MB2 Canal Detection in Maxillary Molars: A Scoping Review.

July 23, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Shaiban AS,Alobaid MA,Alqahtani OS,Alroomy R,Jabali A,Almnea RA,Alaajam WH,Mehta V,AlMoaleem MM

Affiliations (7)

  • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Endodontic Division, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
  • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, India; Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ibn al-Nafis for Medical Sciences, San'a, 14034, Yemen. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

The second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal detection in maxillary molars represents a notable challenge in endodontics. This scoping review (SR) attempts to map the existing research on artificial intelligence (AI)-based models in MB2 detection, delineating the current stage of clinical readiness and gaps associated with routine clinical implementation. A comprehensive, independent search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) to synthesize evidence from inception to 20 February 2026, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and PRISMA-Scr checklist. Study designs, including observational, diagnostic accuracy, as well as experimental designs investigating human permanent maxillary molars employing AI approaches, including machine learning or deep learning models, were included. From 1218 identified records, 5 studies met inclusion criteria. All 5 studies reported strong diagnostic performance of AI models in detecting MB2 canals with favourable diagnostic performance in both deep learning and machine learning models. The clinical readiness assessment using the Technology Readiness Level - Implementation Science framework reported progression of all 5 studies to level 4. Overall risk of bias (RoB) assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool reflected some concerns, highlighting unclear or insufficient methodological components and low overall applicability concerns. RoB assessment was visualized via the ROBVIS tool. Overall, AI models demonstrate favourable diagnostic performance for MB2 canal identification; however, current evidence highlights important limitations in their translational readiness. AI-based tools show near-expert accuracy for MB2 detection on cone beam computed tomography, but all current models remain at the prototype stage without real-world validation. They should be used as decision-support adjuncts, not standalone diagnostic systems.

Topics

Journal ArticleReview

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.