Predicting ADC map quality from T2-weighted MRI: A deep learning approach for early quality assessment to assist point-of-care.
Authors
Affiliations (6)
Affiliations (6)
- Radiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States; Molecular Imaging Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Radiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
- Radiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States; Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, United States.
- Molecular Imaging Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, United States.
- Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Abstract
Poor quality prostate MRI images compromise diagnostic accuracy, with diffusion-weighted imaging and the resulting apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps being particularly vulnerable. These maps are critical for prostate cancer diagnosis, yet current methods relying on standardizing technical parameters fail to consistently ensure image quality. We propose a novel deep learning approach to predict low-quality ADC maps using T2-weighted (T2W) images, enabling real-time corrective interventions during imaging. A multi-site dataset of T2W images and ADC maps from 486 patients, spanning 62 external clinics and in-house imaging, was retrospectively analyzed. A neural network was trained to classify ADC map quality as "diagnostic" or "non-diagnostic" based solely on T2W images. Rectal cross-sectional area measurements were evaluated as an interpretable metric for susceptibility-induced distortions. Analysis revealed limited correlation between individual acquisition parameters and image quality, with horizontal phase encoding significant for T2 imaging (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.6735) and vertical resolution for ADC maps (p = 0.006, AUC = 0.6348). By contrast, the neural network achieved robust performance for ADC map quality prediction from T2 images, with 83 % sensitivity and 90 % negative predictive value in multicenter validation, comparable to single-site models using ADC maps directly. Remarkably, it generalized well to unseen in-house data (94 ± 2 % accuracy). Rectal cross-sectional area correlated with ADC quality (AUC = 0.65), offering a simple, interpretable metric. The probability of low quality, uninterpretable ADC maps can be inferred early in the imaging process by a neural network approach, allowing corrective action to be employed.