Deep learning-based image reconstruction significantly improves image quality of MRI examinations of the orbit at 3 Tesla.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, 75019 Paris, France. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, 75019 Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France.
- Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, 75019 Paris, France.
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, 75019 Paris, France.
- Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, 75019 Paris, France.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLBIR) for improving image quality in orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla (T). Seventy-one patients (48 women and 23 men) with a mean age of 52 ± 19.5 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 7-90 years) who underwent MRI examination of the orbit at 3 T between January and June of 2024, were included in the study. Coronal T2-weighted MR images obtained in 70 patients and post-contrast fat-saturated (FS) coronal T1-weighted MR images obtained in 25 patients, were reconstructed with and without DLBIR, resulting in four imaging sets. Two radiologists independently and blindly measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the optic nerves on the four imaging sets. Image quality and orbital abnormalities were assessed using a standardized 5-point Likert scale. Comparisons between MR images obtained with and without DLBIR were performed using Wilcoxon test for ordinal and quantitative variables and McNemar test for paired binary data. SNR and CNR of coronal T2-weighted MR images were significantly greater using DLBIR (26.67 ± 9.03 [SD], and 14.87 ± 10.31 [SD], respectively) than without DLBIR (18.91 ± 7.28 [SD], and 9.78 ± 8.47 [SD], respectively) (P < 0.001). There were no differences in SNR and CNR between post-contrast FS T1-weighted images obtained with DLBIR (85.56 ± 63.13 [SD], and 64 ± 41.38 [SD], respectively) and those obtained without DLBIR (91.36 ± 48.49 [SD], and 43.25 ± 20.4 [SD], respectively) (P = 0.35, and P = 0.14, respectively). Qualitatively, good-to-excellent image quality was obtained more frequently with DLBIR than without DLBIR for T2-weighted and post-contrast FS T1-weighted images with respect to optic nerve sharpness (67 % vs. 16 %, and 8 % vs. 0 %, respectively), brain sharpness (90 % vs. 6 %, and 68 % vs. 4 %, respectively), and overall image quality (73 % vs. 1 % and 36 % vs. 0 %, respectively) (all P ≤ 0.001). No significant differences in the detection rates of orbital abnormalities were found between MR images obtained with and without DLBIR, including optic nerve hyperintensity (34 % vs. 31 %, respectively; P = 0.16) and optic nerve atrophy (33 % for both) on T2-weighted images, and optic nerve enhancement on post-contrast FS T1-weighted images (16 % for both). DLBIR significantly improves image quality of MRI examinations of the orbit at 3 T, without losing clinically relevant information.