The added value of artificial intelligence using Quantib Prostate for the detection of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy. [email protected].
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna Kore, Enna, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed to assist radiologists in reporting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. We evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologists with different levels of experience when reporting mpMRI with the support of available AI-based software (Quantib Prostate). This is a single-center study (NCT06298305) involving 110 patients. Those with a positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) underwent targeted plus systematic biopsy (TBx plus SBx), while those with a negative mpMRI but a high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) underwent SBx. Three readers with different levels of experience, identified as R1, R2, and R3 reviewed all mpMRI. Inter-reader agreement among the three readers with or without the assistance of Quantib Prostate as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) were assessed. 102 patients underwent prostate biopsy and the csPCa detection rate was 47%. Using Quantib Prostate resulted in an increased number of lesions identified for R3 (101 vs. 127). Inter-reader agreement slightly increased when using Quantib Prostate from 0.37 to 0.41 without vs. with Quantib Prostate, respectively. PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy (measured by the area under the curve [AUC]) of R3 improved (0.51 vs. 0.55, 0.65 vs.0.82 and 0.56 vs. 0.62, respectively). Conversely, no changes were observed for R1 and R2. Using Quantib Prostate did not enhance the detection rate of csPCa for readers with some experience in prostate imaging. However, for an inexperienced reader, this AI-based software is demonstrated to improve the performance. Name of registry: clinicaltrials.gov. NCT06298305. Date of registration: 2022-09.