Back to all papers

A machine learning AI model for predicting condylar erosion in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders and analyzing factors contributing to prediction.

June 15, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Nozawa M,Ariji Y,Fukuda M,Kotaki S,Ariji E

Affiliations (4)

  • Department of Oral Radiology, Osaka Dental University, 1-5-17 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan. [email protected].
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-Dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan. [email protected].
  • Department of Oral Radiology, Osaka Dental University, 1-5-17 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan.
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-Dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.

Abstract

In temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis, condylar erosion is considered a sign of disease progression. Few studies have clarified the extent to which clinical and imaging findings are associated with erosion. The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning model to predict condylar erosion and identify the parameters contributing to prediction. We enrolled 197 patients (394 joints) in this study. Condylar erosion was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and panoramic radiographs. Clinical data included age, sex, duration of symptoms, maximum mouth opening, joint sounds, temporomandibular joint pain, and masticatory muscle pain. MRI findings were evaluated for disc shape and position, signal changes at the posterior disc attachment (PDA), joint effusion, bone edema, condylar position, and limited movement. Erosion prediction was performed using clinical and MRI data with Prediction One and random forest models. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Parameters contributing to prediction were analyzed. Prediction One showed AUC 0.845, accuracy 0.779, sensitivity 0.777, and specificity 0.780. Random forest had AUC 0.836, accuracy 0.759, sensitivity 0.777, and specificity 0.753. The top five parameters contributing to prediction in Prediction One were signal changes at PDA, disc position, bone edema, disc shape, and joint effusion; in random forest, these were disc position, joint effusion, signal changes at PDA, bone edema, and disc shape. We developed a highly accurate model for predicting condylar erosion and identified those parameters contributing to the prediction.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.