Area detection improves the person-based performance of a deep learning system for classifying the presence of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographs.
Authors
Affiliations (4)
Affiliations (4)
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-Dori, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, Japan. [email protected].
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-Dori, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, Japan.
- Department of Oral Radiology, Osaka Dental University, 5-17, Otemae 1-Chome, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, Japan.
- Department of Advanced General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
This study investigated deep learning (DL) systems for diagnosing carotid artery calcifications (CAC) on panoramic radiographs. To this end, two DL systems, one with preceding and one with simultaneous area detection functions, were developed to classify CAC on panoramic radiographs, and their person-based classification performances were compared with that of a DL model directly created using entire panoramic radiographs. A total of 580 panoramic radiographs from 290 patients (with CAC) and 290 controls (without CAC) were used to create and evaluate the DL systems. Two convolutional neural networks, GoogLeNet and YOLOv7, were utilized. The following three systems were created: (1) direct classification of entire panoramic images (System 1), (2) preceding region-of-interest (ROI) detection followed by classification (System 2), and (3) simultaneous ROI detection and classification (System 3). Person-based evaluation using the same test data was performed to compare the three systems. A side-based (left and right sides of participants) evaluation was also performed on Systems 2 and 3. Between-system differences in area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) were assessed using DeLong's test. For the side-based evaluation, the AUCs of Systems 2 and 3 were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively, and in the person-based evaluation, Systems 2 and 3 had significantly higher AUC values of 0.86 and 0.90, respectively, compared with System 1 (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between Systems 2 and 3. Preceding or simultaneous use of area detection improved the person-based performance of DL for classifying the presence of CAC on panoramic radiographs.