Back to all papers

Well-designed k-space coverage is important for good MRI denoising.

March 19, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Wang J,Haldar JP

Affiliations (2)

  • Signal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. [email protected].
  • Signal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.

Abstract

Modern computational MRI denoising approaches are often designed assuming fixed k-space coverage. This contrasts with earlier acquisition-design literature that leveraged k-space coverage modifications (e.g., reducing spatial resolution) to improve SNR. This work investigates whether the performance of modern computational denoising methods can be further enhanced by k-space coverage modifications. Using realistic simulations of noisy data, k-space coverage and averaging patterns were optimized for two advanced image denoising/reconstruction approaches: parallel imaging with total variation regularization and a U-Net neural network. For reference, comparisons against classical linear filtering/apodization methods were also performed. Performance was quantified using normalized root-mean-squared error (NRMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM) metrics. Advanced computational denoising methods can be substantially enhanced, both quantitatively and qualitatively, by reducing the spatial resolution of the acquisition to improve SNR. Indeed, even simple linear filtering/apodization with optimized k-space coverage can rival advanced methods using naive higher-resolution coverage. Classical acquisition design principles that allow spatial resolution to be traded for SNR enhancement are still very relevant for modern computational denoising techniques. However, the optimization of k-space coverage and denoising/reconstruction methods can also be somewhat confounded because the NRMSE and SSIM metrics have low sensitivity to spatial resolution.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.