Back to all papers

Fat-water MRI separation using deep complex convolution network.

Authors

Ganeshkumar M,Kandasamy D,Sharma R,Mehndiratta A

Affiliations (5)

  • Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
  • Department of Radio Diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India. [email protected].
  • Yardi School of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India. [email protected].
  • Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia. [email protected].

Abstract

Deep complex convolutional networks (DCCNs) utilize complex-valued convolutions and can process complex-valued MRI signals directly without splitting them into two real-valued magnitude and phase components. The performance of DCCN and real-valued U-Net is thoroughly investigated in the physics-informed subject-specific ad-hoc reconstruction method for fat-water separation and is compared against a widely used reference approach. A comprehensive test dataset (n = 33) was used for performance analysis. The 2012 ISMRM fat-water separation workshop dataset containing 28 batches of multi-echo MRIs with 3-15 echoes from the abdomen, thigh, knee, and phantoms, acquired with 1.5 T and 3 T scanners were used. Additionally, five MAFLD patients multi-echo MRIs acquired from our clinical radiology department were also used. The quantitative results demonstrated that DCCN produced fat-water maps with better normalized RMS error and structural similarity index with the reference approach, compared to real-valued U-Nets in the ad-hoc reconstruction method for fat-water separation. The DCCN achieved an overall average SSIM of 0.847 ± 0.069 and 0.861 ± 0.078 in generating fat and water maps, respectively, in contrast the U-Net achieved only 0.653 ± 0.166 and 0.729 ± 0.134. The average liver PDFF from DCCN achieved a correlation coefficient R of 0.847 with the reference approach.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.