Back to all papers

A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

November 14, 2025pubmed logopapers

Authors

Liu Y,Zhang X,He W,Li Y,Hu F

Affiliations (4)

  • Department of radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
  • Department of radiology, The People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, China.
  • Department of Research and Development, United Imaging Healthcare (China), Shanghai, China.
  • Department of radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China. [email protected].

Abstract

To develop and validate a 2.5D multi-angle deep learning (MADL) model for preoperative T-staging in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the predictive potential for survival outcome. In this retrospective study, GC datasets from four centers were used to develop a quaternary for preoperative T-staging model by integrating CT images with nine 2D slicers and three angles (0°, + 45°, -45°) from transverse, sagittal, and coronal views. Diagnostic performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score) were compared between the 2.5D MADL and radiologists. The prognostic potential of 2.5D MADL-derived features was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression. A total of 433 patients were divided into the training (n = 346, mean age, 64.8 years ± 10.5 [SD]; 95 female) and the internal validation (n = 87, mean age, 63.0 years ± 11.9; 23 female) sets from Centers 1-3, and 41 patients (mean age, 64.6 years ± 8.9; 10 female) formed the external testing set from Center 4. The 2.5D MADL model exhibited excellent diagnostic performance for T-staging in external testing set (AUCs of T1-T4: 0.962, 0.722, 0.913, 0.962). For T1 staging, it outperformed radiologists in accuracy (95% vs. 83%), sensitivity (75% vs. 12%), and F1 score (86% vs. 22%) in external testing set. Survival analysis showed significant overall survival differences between high- and low-risk groups stratified (P < 0.001), with high-risk patients having shorter survival (HR = 1.632, 95% CI:1.239-2.150). The 2.5D MADL model achieves accurate and reliable preoperative T staging of gastric cancer, with performance comparable to radiologists and superior accuracy for early-stage disease.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.