Support vector machine classification of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET scans across subtypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuveny, Leuven, Belgium. [email protected].
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Neurology department, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuveny, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
While <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging has demonstrated diagnostic value in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (PwALS) and group-level differences were identified between different disease subtypes (e.g., genetic and clinical variants), refining and validating a machine-learning-based subject-level diagnostic algorithm may improve the general applicability and reliability of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET as a diagnostic tool in ALS. In this study, we employed support vector machines (SVM) to further explore the diagnostic potential of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in ALS, alongside its ability to classify between different genetic subtypes or clinical phenotypes. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET data of 36 healthy volunteers (HV), 25 people with ALS-mimicking diseases (Mimics), and 167 PwALS, grouped by genetic status (e.g., sporadic (sALS) or carrying a C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion (ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup>) and onset (bulbar or spinal) type, acquired with Biograph 'TruePoint' PET/CT scanner, were included in the study (Dataset 1). A second dataset of 183 PwALS and 31 Mimics acquired with Biograph 'HiRez' scanner was included as an independent cross-validation set (Dataset 2). PET images were spatially normalised to MNI space to fit linear SVMs with cross-validation. Only age-matched groups were considered to eliminate age-related effects. For Dataset 1, the linear SVM resulted in an average accuracy of 0.86 for the classification of ALS vs. HV, 0.53 for ALS vs. Mimics, 0.83 for ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup> vs. sALS, and 0.58 for bulbar vs. spinal onset. These findings were corroborated with Dataset2, with an accuracy of up to 0.76 for ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup> vs. sALS, and 0.59 for bulbar vs. spinal. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG brain PET imaging, combined with SVM and age-matching, can distinguish between ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup> and sALS with good accuracy, but lacks sufficient discriminative power to differentiate between ALS and Mimics and between different sites of onset.