Digital versus analogue PET in parathyroid imaging: comparison of PET metrics and machine learning-based characterisation of hyperfunctioning lesions (the DIGI-PET study).
Authors
Affiliations (9)
Affiliations (9)
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, Rome, 00133, Italy. [email protected].
- Department of Engineering, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), University of Bari"Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Oncohaematology, Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
- Endocrinology Unit, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, Rome, 00133, Italy.
- Section of Nuclear Medicine and Health Physics, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Abstract
To compare PET-derived metrics between digital and analogue PET/CT in hyperparathyroidism, and to assess whether machine learning (ML) applied to quantitative PET parameters can distinguish parathyroid adenoma (PA) from hyperplasia (PH). From an initial multi-centre cohort of 179 patients, 86 were included, comprising 89 PET-positive lesions confirmed histologically (74 PA, 15 PH). Quantitative PET parameters-maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), target-to-background ratio (TBR), and maximum diameter-along with serum PTH and calcium levels, were compared between digital and analogue PET scanners using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal threshold values. ML models (LASSO, decision tree, Gaussian naïve Bayes) were trained on harmonised quantitative features to distinguish PA from PH. Digital PET detected significantly smaller lesions than analogue PET, in both metabolic volume (1.32 ± 1.39 vs. 2.36 ± 2.01 cc; p < 0.001) and maximum diameter (8.35 ± 4.32 vs. 11.87 ± 5.29 mm; p < 0.001). PA lesions showed significantly higher SUVmax and TBR compared to PH (SUVmax: 8.58 ± 3.70 vs. 5.27 ± 2.34; TBR: 14.67 ± 6.99 vs. 8.82 ± 5.90; both p < 0.001). The optimal thresholds for identifying PA were SUVmax > 5.89 and TBR > 11.5. The best ML model (LASSO) achieved an AUC of 0.811, with 79.7% accuracy and balanced sensitivity and specificity. Digital PET outperforms analogue system in detecting small parathyroid lesions. Additionally, ML analysis of PET-derived metrics and PTH may support non-invasive distinction between adenoma and hyperplasia.