Clinical validation of a deep learning model for low-count PET image enhancement.
Authors
Affiliations (8)
Affiliations (8)
- School of Medical Information Engineering, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China.
- Laboratory for Intelligent Medical Imaging, Tsinghua Cross-Strait Research Institute, Xiamen, 361000, China.
- RadioDynamic Medical, Shanghai, 200333, China.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400013, China.
- School of Medical Information Engineering, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China. [email protected].
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China. [email protected].
- Institute of Magnetic Resonance and Molecular Imaging in Medicine, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China. [email protected].
Abstract
To investigate the effects of the deep learning model RaDynPET on fourfold reduced-count whole-body PET examinations. A total of 120 patients (84 internal cohorts and 36 external cohorts) undergoing <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT examinations were enrolled. PET images were reconstructed using OSEM algorithm with 120-s (G120) and 30-s (G30) list-mode data. RaDynPET was developed to generate enhanced images (R30) from G30. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians independently evaluated subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. Standardized uptake values (SUV), standard deviations, liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. Subgroup analyses evaluated performance across demographics, and lesion detectability were evaluated using external datasets. RaDynPET was also compared to other deep learning methods. In internal cohorts, R30 demonstrated significantly higher image quality scores than G30 and G120. R30 showed excellent agreement with G120 for liver and lesion SUV values and surpassed G120 in liver SNR and CNR. Liver SNR and CNR of R30 were comparable to G120 in thin group, and the CNR of R30 was comparable to G120 in young age group. In external cohorts, R30 maintained strong SUV agreement with G120, with lesion-level sensitivity and specificity of 95.45% and 98.41%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in lesion detection between R30 and G120. RaDynPET achieved the highest PSNR and SSIM among deep learning methods. The RaDynPET model effectively restored high image quality while maintaining SUV agreement for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET scans acquired in 25% of the standard acquisition time.