Back to all papers

Self-calibrated B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> and B<sub>0</sub> Field Inhomogeneities Estimation (SAFE) in 3D Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting.

July 21, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Gao M,Cao X,Abraham DR,Zhou Z,Wang N,Liao C,Yang Y,Sun H,Li H,Bai Y,Shen Y,Wu Y,Wang M,Setsompop K

Affiliations (7)

  • Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
  • Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
  • Department of Radiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
  • People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Abstract

To develop SAFE, a self-calibrated framework to estimate B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> and B<sub>0</sub> field inhomogeneities directly from conventional magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) acquisitions and improve its quantification accuracy. SAFE utilized a two-step approach. First, two physics-informed image markers are extracted from the MRF data to create a magnitude and a phase image that are highly correlated with B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> and B<sub>0</sub> inhomogeneities, respectively. Second, a deep learning (DL) network is applied to map these markers to quantitative field maps. SAFE was tested on 3D Spiral Projection Imaging MRF brain acquisition at 3T, where the network was trained and validated across a multi-site, multi-vendor dataset (N = 358) from healthy volunteers and clinical population. The capability of SAFE to be applied to unseen MRF sequences with different signal preparations and flip-angle trains through adaptively retraining without the need for additional training data was also tested. SAFE achieved normalized-root-mean-square-error within 3% against gold-standard field-calibration scans on both B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> and B<sub>0</sub> maps (N = 32), with high performance remaining on datasets from scanners that the training data were acquired from. T1 and T2 biases were shown to be effectively corrected on healthy volunteers, a patient with brain tumor, and a pediatric subject. Tissue quantification accuracy after SAFE-estimated field correction was validated on a large patient cohort (N = 86). SAFE was also demonstrated to be adaptable to different MRF sequences without acquiring additional training data. By combining physics-informed image markers with DL, the proposed SAFE framework enables calibration-free estimation of B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> and B<sub>0</sub> field inhomogeneities at 3T for whole brain MRF.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.