Evaluating both AI algorithms and human users is key for safe adoption in high-stakes healthcare settings, according to an Ohio State study.
Key Details
- 1Researchers studied 462 nursing students and professionals using AI-assisted patient monitoring simulations.
- 2Accurate AI predictions improved decision making by up to 60%, but inaccurate AI caused over a 100% drop in correct decisions.
- 3Explanations and supporting data had minimal impact; participants were highly influenced by AI predictions.
- 4The study calls for simultaneous evaluation of both algorithms and clinical users in safety-critical settings.
- 5Findings appear in npj Digital Medicine (DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01784-y).
Why It Matters
This work highlights the risks of over-reliance on AI in clinical workflows and underscores the necessity for robust, joint evaluation protocols in radiology and other safety-critical healthcare applications, ensuring that human-AI teams can handle both good and poor system performance.
Source
EurekAlert
Related News
•EurekAlert
AI Model Predicts Growth Spurts from Pediatric Neck X-rays for Orthodontics
Korean researchers developed an AI system (ARNet-v2) that predicts children's growth spurts from neck X-rays to enhance orthodontic treatment planning.
•EurekAlert
Dana-Farber Showcases AI and Clinical Trial Advances at ESMO 2025
Dana-Farber researchers present major cancer clinical trial results, including AI-driven data analysis, at ESMO Congress 2025.
•EurekAlert
Einstein College Awarded $18M NIH Grant to Develop AI Tools for Mental Health Crisis Prediction
Albert Einstein College of Medicine received an $18 million NIH grant to create AI-based tools for predicting mental health crises using cognitive monitoring.