Evaluating both AI algorithms and human users is key for safe adoption in high-stakes healthcare settings, according to an Ohio State study.
Key Details
- 1Researchers studied 462 nursing students and professionals using AI-assisted patient monitoring simulations.
- 2Accurate AI predictions improved decision making by up to 60%, but inaccurate AI caused over a 100% drop in correct decisions.
- 3Explanations and supporting data had minimal impact; participants were highly influenced by AI predictions.
- 4The study calls for simultaneous evaluation of both algorithms and clinical users in safety-critical settings.
- 5Findings appear in npj Digital Medicine (DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01784-y).
Why It Matters
This work highlights the risks of over-reliance on AI in clinical workflows and underscores the necessity for robust, joint evaluation protocols in radiology and other safety-critical healthcare applications, ensuring that human-AI teams can handle both good and poor system performance.
Source
EurekAlert
Related News
•EurekAlert
MIT Introduces Interactive AI System for Fast Medical Image Annotation
MIT researchers have developed MultiverSeg, an interactive AI tool enabling efficient, user-driven segmentation of biomedical image datasets without prior model training.
•EurekAlert
Study Finds Gaps in FDA Safety Reporting for AI Medical Devices
A study highlights insufficient standardized safety and efficacy assessments for FDA-cleared AI/ML medical devices.
•EurekAlert
UCLA Unveils Light-Based AI System for Energy-Efficient Image Generation
Researchers at UCLA have developed an optical generative AI model that creates images using minimal energy and computational steps.