A study finds mammography acquisition settings influence both AI and radiologist performance in breast cancer detection.
Key Details
- 1Seven acquisition parameters studied: machine type, kVp, x-ray exposure, relative exposure, paddle size, compression force, tissue thickness.
- 2Dataset: 28,278 2D mammograms from 22,626 women; 324 with cancer diagnosis within a year.
- 3Radiologists: Sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 88.7%; AI: Sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 76.9%.
- 4Increased x-ray exposure reduced specificity for AI but not radiologists; increased compression reduced specificity for radiologists but not AI.
- 5Trends for kVp: little effect on sensitivity, slight increase in specificity for both AI and radiologists.
Why It Matters
Understanding how technical factors affect AI versus human interpretation is vital for optimizing AI deployment in mammography. These insights could inform guidelines, quality control, and trust calibration when integrating AI into clinical screening workflows.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Radiology Business
AI Automates Head CT Reformatting, Improving Efficiency and Consistency
Researchers at UC Irvine used deep learning to automate head CT reformatting, improving workflow standardization and efficiency.
•Radiology Business
Google's Gemini Outperforms Providers in Communicating IR Procedures
Large language models like Google's Gemini demonstrate higher accuracy and greater empathy than human providers when answering patient questions about interventional radiology.
•AuntMinnie
Comparing False-Positive Findings: AI vs. Radiologists in DBT Screening
AI and radiologists differ in the types and patient characteristics of false-positive findings in digital breast tomosynthesis breast cancer screening.