Back to all news
Literature Review Highlights Gaps in Economic Evaluation of Healthcare AI
Tags:Research

A Finnish review finds significant gaps in economic evaluation reporting of AI technologies in Western healthcare.
Key Details
- 1A literature review examined economic evaluations of AI in healthcare, revealing insufficient research and inconsistent reporting.
- 2Over half of the reviewed studies (55.6%, n=10) only broadly described methods as 'ML' or 'deep learning,' lacking system-specific details.
- 3Most studies did not account for all costs, such as integration, support, or maintenance of AI systems.
- 4There is a need for unified guidelines for economic evaluation and reporting of AI in healthcare.
- 5The article emphasizes ongoing interdependencies and evolving performance of AI systems in real-world clinical settings.
Why It Matters
Clear and comprehensive economic evaluations are essential for decision-makers considering the adoption of AI in radiology and wider healthcare. The lack of robust, standardized evaluation methods may impede informed investments and implementation of AI technologies.

Source
AI in Healthcare
Related News

•Radiology Business
AI Triage Cuts CT Report Turnaround for Pulmonary Embolism—Daytime Only
FDA-backed study finds AI triage tools reduce radiology CT report turnaround times for pulmonary embolism during peak hours.

•Cardiovascular Business
AI Uses Mammograms to Predict Women’s Cardiovascular Disease Risk
AI algorithms can analyze mammograms to predict cardiovascular disease risk, expanding the utility of breast imaging.

•Health Imaging
Most FDA-Cleared AI Devices Lack Pre-Approval Safety Data, Study Finds
A new study finds fewer than 30% of FDA-cleared AI medical devices reported key safety or adverse event data before approval.