Research finds insufficient data transparency for FDA-cleared AI devices in Alzheimer’s imaging, raising bias and generalizability concerns.
Key Details
- 124 AI/ML-based devices for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) were FDA-authorized between January 2015 and December 2024.
- 291.7% (22/24) were cleared via the 510(k) pathway; 8.3% (2/24) through de novo classification.
- 3For 12 devices, there was no info on training or validation data in FDA summaries or peer-reviewed articles.
- 4Only 2 FDA summaries (8.3%) included external validation data; 10 peer-reviewed articles (41.7%) provided such data.
- 5Reporting of disease status, age, sex, race, and ethnicity was rare across most devices; demographic transparency was lacking.
- 6Most devices (21) were reviewed by radiology panels and primarily involved MRI and PET imaging.
Why It Matters
Transparent disclosure of training and validation data, especially demographic details, is vital for assessing bias and clinical accuracy in AI-based imaging devices. Without sufficient data transparency, there is uncertainty about the generalizability and safety of these AI tools in real-world, diverse patient populations.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Radiology Business
Automation Bias: How AI Can Compromise Radiologist Accuracy
AI decision support can induce automation bias, leading radiologists to accept incorrect interpretations and potentially reduce their diagnostic accuracy.
•AuntMinnie
Study Reveals Major Impact of Incorrect AI Suggestions in Mammography Reads
Incorrect AI suggestions, especially false-negatives, significantly reduce reader sensitivity and alter visual search in mammography interpretation.
•Radiology Business
Framework Assesses Real-World Financial Impact of Radiology AI Adoption
A new analysis presents a financial calculator for objectively assessing the return on investment (ROI) of implementing radiology AI solutions.