Research finds insufficient data transparency for FDA-cleared AI devices in Alzheimer’s imaging, raising bias and generalizability concerns.
Key Details
- 124 AI/ML-based devices for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) were FDA-authorized between January 2015 and December 2024.
- 291.7% (22/24) were cleared via the 510(k) pathway; 8.3% (2/24) through de novo classification.
- 3For 12 devices, there was no info on training or validation data in FDA summaries or peer-reviewed articles.
- 4Only 2 FDA summaries (8.3%) included external validation data; 10 peer-reviewed articles (41.7%) provided such data.
- 5Reporting of disease status, age, sex, race, and ethnicity was rare across most devices; demographic transparency was lacking.
- 6Most devices (21) were reviewed by radiology panels and primarily involved MRI and PET imaging.
Why It Matters
Transparent disclosure of training and validation data, especially demographic details, is vital for assessing bias and clinical accuracy in AI-based imaging devices. Without sufficient data transparency, there is uncertainty about the generalizability and safety of these AI tools in real-world, diverse patient populations.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Radiology Business
Google's Gemini Outperforms Providers in Communicating IR Procedures
Large language models like Google's Gemini demonstrate higher accuracy and greater empathy than human providers when answering patient questions about interventional radiology.
•AuntMinnie
Comparing False-Positive Findings: AI vs. Radiologists in DBT Screening
AI and radiologists differ in the types and patient characteristics of false-positive findings in digital breast tomosynthesis breast cancer screening.
•Radiology Business
AI Triage Cuts CT Report Turnaround for Pulmonary Embolism—Daytime Only
FDA-backed study finds AI triage tools reduce radiology CT report turnaround times for pulmonary embolism during peak hours.