Research finds insufficient data transparency for FDA-cleared AI devices in Alzheimer’s imaging, raising bias and generalizability concerns.
Key Details
- 124 AI/ML-based devices for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) were FDA-authorized between January 2015 and December 2024.
- 291.7% (22/24) were cleared via the 510(k) pathway; 8.3% (2/24) through de novo classification.
- 3For 12 devices, there was no info on training or validation data in FDA summaries or peer-reviewed articles.
- 4Only 2 FDA summaries (8.3%) included external validation data; 10 peer-reviewed articles (41.7%) provided such data.
- 5Reporting of disease status, age, sex, race, and ethnicity was rare across most devices; demographic transparency was lacking.
- 6Most devices (21) were reviewed by radiology panels and primarily involved MRI and PET imaging.
Why It Matters
Transparent disclosure of training and validation data, especially demographic details, is vital for assessing bias and clinical accuracy in AI-based imaging devices. Without sufficient data transparency, there is uncertainty about the generalizability and safety of these AI tools in real-world, diverse patient populations.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•AuntMinnie
LLMs Demonstrate Strong Potential in Interventional Radiology Patient Education
DeepSeek-V3 and ChatGPT-4o excelled in accurately answering patient questions about interventional radiology procedures, suggesting LLMs' growing role in clinical communication.
•Radiology Business
Women's Uncertainty About AI in Breast Imaging May Limit Acceptance
Many women remain unclear about the role of AI in breast imaging, creating hesitation toward its adoption.
•AuntMinnie
Stanford Team Introduces Real-Time AI Safety Monitoring for Radiology
Stanford researchers introduced an ensemble monitoring model to provide real-time confidence assessments for FDA-cleared radiology AI tools.