AI and radiologists differ in the types and patient characteristics of false-positive findings in digital breast tomosynthesis breast cancer screening.
Key Details
- 1Study included 2,977 women (average age 58) and 3,183 DBT exams (2013–2017) from UCLA.
- 2AI-only false positives mostly flagged benign calcifications (40%), while radiologists mostly flagged masses (47%).
- 3AI and radiologists had nearly identical false-positive rates: 9.7% (AI) vs. 9.5% (radiologists).
- 4Of 541 false-positive exams, 43% were AI-only, 44% were radiologist-only, and 13% were flagged by both.
- 5AI-only false positives occurred in older women (average 60 years), less often with dense breasts (24%), and more often with prior surgical history (37%).
- 6Concordant (AI-radiologist) flagged findings needing biopsy were high-risk in 44% of cases.
Why It Matters
Identifying how AI and radiologists differ in false-positive findings can inform the design of AI tools to improve screening specificity and reduce unnecessary recalls, directly impacting efficiency and patient care in breast imaging.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Radiology Business
Google's Gemini Outperforms Providers in Communicating IR Procedures
Large language models like Google's Gemini demonstrate higher accuracy and greater empathy than human providers when answering patient questions about interventional radiology.
•AI in Healthcare
FDA Seeks Real-World Performance Insights on AI Medical Devices
FDA calls for healthcare worker feedback to enhance monitoring of AI-enabled medical devices in real-world settings.
•Radiology Business
AI Triage Cuts CT Report Turnaround for Pulmonary Embolism—Daytime Only
FDA-backed study finds AI triage tools reduce radiology CT report turnaround times for pulmonary embolism during peak hours.