AI and radiologists differ in the types and patient characteristics of false-positive findings in digital breast tomosynthesis breast cancer screening.
Key Details
- 1Study included 2,977 women (average age 58) and 3,183 DBT exams (2013–2017) from UCLA.
- 2AI-only false positives mostly flagged benign calcifications (40%), while radiologists mostly flagged masses (47%).
- 3AI and radiologists had nearly identical false-positive rates: 9.7% (AI) vs. 9.5% (radiologists).
- 4Of 541 false-positive exams, 43% were AI-only, 44% were radiologist-only, and 13% were flagged by both.
- 5AI-only false positives occurred in older women (average 60 years), less often with dense breasts (24%), and more often with prior surgical history (37%).
- 6Concordant (AI-radiologist) flagged findings needing biopsy were high-risk in 44% of cases.
Why It Matters
Identifying how AI and radiologists differ in false-positive findings can inform the design of AI tools to improve screening specificity and reduce unnecessary recalls, directly impacting efficiency and patient care in breast imaging.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•AuntMinnie
AI-Based Slab Reconstruction Streamlines Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
AI-driven slab reconstruction in DBT improves workflow efficiency without compromising diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer screening.
•AuntMinnie
AI Model Uses Ultrasound to Assess Fetal Lung Maturity
Researchers demonstrated an AI model's strong accuracy in measuring fetal lung maturity from ultrasound images.
•AuntMinnie
AI Model Predicts Dosimetry for Lu-177 PSMA Therapy Using PET/CT
A machine learning PET/CT model shows promise for predicting radiation dose prior to Lu-177 PSMA therapy in prostate cancer patients.