AI demonstrates higher accuracy than radiologists in predicting lung cancer treatment response from imaging.
Key Details
- 1Study is a meta-analysis of 11 retrospective studies comparing AI and radiologists for treatment response prediction.
- 2AI achieved a sensitivity of 0.90, specificity of 0.80, and accuracy of 0.90.
- 3Risk difference favored AI by 0.06 for sensitivity and 0.04 for specificity.
- 4Outcomes were modality-dependent, impacting the magnitude of AI's advantage.
Why It Matters
Improved prediction of treatment response could lead to more effective, personalized cancer care and alter clinical decision workflows. The results support the increasing role of AI in enhancing the accuracy of imaging-based assessments in oncology.
Source
Health Imaging
Related News
•AuntMinnie
AI Tool Mirai Shows Robust Performance for Interval Breast Cancer Detection
The Mirai AI model significantly improves detection of interval breast cancers in negative screening mammograms.
•Radiology Business
AI Tool Predicts Interval Breast Cancer Risk from Negative Mammograms
AI can predict interval breast cancer risk up to three years after a negative mammogram.
•Radiology Business
AI Outperforms Radiologists in Predicting Lung Cancer Treatment Response
AI tools demonstrate higher accuracy than radiologists in predicting lung cancer treatment response from imaging studies.