A South Korean study finds that AI-generated chest x-ray reports are nearly as clinically acceptable as radiologist-written reports under standard criteria.
Key Details
- 1AI-generated and radiologist-written reports showed similar acceptability under a standard criterion: 88.4% vs 89.2% (p = 0.36).
- 2Under a more stringent criterion (acceptable without revision), AI was less acceptable: 66.8% vs 75.7% (p < 0.001).
- 3The model (KARA-CXR) was trained on 8.8 million chest x-rays from 42 institutions across South Korea and the U.S.
- 4AI-generated reports demonstrated higher sensitivity for referable abnormalities (81.2% vs 59.4%) but lower specificity (81% vs 93.6%) compared to radiologists.
- 5Seven thoracic radiologists independently evaluated report acceptability; most felt AI was not yet ready to replace human radiologists.
- 6Editorials note AI is diagnostically positioned between residents and board-certified radiologists.
Why It Matters
This study demonstrates that AI-generated reporting can meet foundational quality standards, highlighting its potential for expediting workflow in busy or resource-constrained environments. However, the nuanced limitations under more stringent criteria suggest further development is needed for AI to match board-certified radiologist standards.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•AuntMinnie
AI Model Shows Promise for Detecting Meningiomas on Skull X-rays
South Korean researchers developed an AI model that detects meningiomas on skull x-rays, showing high accuracy in initial tests.
•AuntMinnie
Nanox Unveils AI-Ready ARC.X to Advance Preventive Imaging Access
Nanox is driving initiatives to make preventive imaging more accessible through new technology, collaborations, and policy changes.
•AuntMinnie
AI Advances Push Opportunistic Imaging Into Clinical Focus
AI-powered opportunistic screening is transforming routine radiological images into proactive tools for risk detection of major diseases.