AI systems in breast imaging yield near-perfect negative predictive value but increase recall rates compared to radiologists, particularly for intermediate-risk classifications.
Key Details
- 1Study published in AJR compared Transpara v1.7.1 AI (ScreenPoint Medical) to 11 breast radiologists.
- 2Digital mammography cohort: 26,693 exams; DBT cohort: 4,824 exams.
- 3AI classified most cases as low risk but doubled or more the recall rate compared to radiologists (up to 41.8% for digital mammography at intermediate/elevated threshold).
- 4AI and radiologists both achieved NPVs of 99.8–99.9%.
- 5Sensitivity for AI at intermediate/elevated risk threshold: 94% (digital mammography), specificity fell to 58.6%.
- 6Researchers emphasized need for strategies to reduce false-positives, especially in intermediate-risk cases.
Why It Matters
While AI systems can improve workflow efficiency in breast cancer screening by safely excluding negative cases, their tendency to elevate recall rates could lead to unnecessary follow-ups and anxiety. Addressing false-positive rates is critical for successful clinical integration and radiologist workload management.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•AuntMinnie
Study: Patients Prefer AI in Radiology as Assistive, Not Standalone Tool
Survey finds patients support AI-assisted radiology but not AI-only interpretations.
•AuntMinnie
AI-Enhanced MRI Boosts Return-to-Play Predictions for Athlete Muscle Injuries
Adding AI to MRI-based classification systems improves return-to-play predictions for professional athletes with muscle injuries.
•HealthExec
AI's Expanding Role in Healthcare and Implications for Radiology
A series of thought leaders and institutions weigh in on AI's transformative potential in healthcare, with emphasis on radiology adoption and responsible use.