
AI models can write convincing fraudulent peer reviews that evade current detection tools, posing a new risk for research integrity.
Key Details
- 1Chinese researchers used the AI model Claude to review 20 actual cancer research manuscripts.
- 2The AI produced highly persuasive rejection letters and requests to cite irrelevant articles.
- 3AI-detection tools misidentified over 80% of the AI-generated reviews as human-written.
- 4Malicious use could enable unfair rejections and citation manipulation within academic publishing.
- 5AI could also help authors craft strong rebuttals to unfair reviews.
- 6Authors call for guidelines and oversight to preserve scientific integrity.
Why It Matters

Source
EurekAlert
Related News

Chinese Researchers Unveil Photonic Chip for Ultra-Fast Image Processing
A new photonic chip achieves image processing at 25 million frames per second with high energy efficiency, promising major advances in real-time imaging and AI applications.

AI Model Predicts Growth Spurts from Pediatric Neck X-rays for Orthodontics
Korean researchers developed an AI system (ARNet-v2) that predicts children's growth spurts from neck X-rays to enhance orthodontic treatment planning.

Imaging Reveals Skull Changes and Immune Impact in Glioblastoma
Advanced imaging uncovers that glioblastoma affects the skull and immune system, not just the brain.