Jurors are more likely to find radiologists at fault if AI detects an abnormality they miss, but transparency about AI error rates can mitigate this effect.
Key Details
- 1Study evaluated over 1,300 mock jurors using vignettes of missed brain bleeds or cancer diagnoses.
- 2Jurors sided with plaintiffs 72.9% (brain bleed) and 78.7% (cancer) when AI flagged missed findings, versus 56.3% and 65.2% with no AI.
- 3Disclosure of AI's false omission (1%) or false discovery (50%) rates reduced perceived radiologist liability.
- 4If both radiologist and AI missed abnormality, jurors were less likely to fault the radiologist (50% for brain bleed, 63.5% for cancer).
- 5Providing AI error rates had stronger mitigating effects for brain bleed cases than for cancer.
Why It Matters
As AI tools become more integrated into radiology workflows, awareness of their error profiles and transparent communication may have significant legal implications. The findings can inform how radiologists document and present AI results to reduce liability risk in diagnostic misses.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Cardiovascular Business
AI Model Dramatically Enhances Severe Heart Attack Detection via ECGs
Queen of Hearts AI model outperforms standard care in detecting severe heart attacks from ECGs.
•AuntMinnie
Machine Learning Model Enhances Risk Stratification for Prostate MRI
Researchers developed machine learning models that outperform PSA testing in predicting abnormal prostate MRI findings for suspected prostate cancer.
•AuntMinnie
AI's Evolving Role in Tackling Radiology Workforce Shortages
AI technologies are emerging as key tools to alleviate radiology workforce shortages by improving efficiency and supporting clinical workflows.