Researchers found that AI-driven decision support improved correct decision rates among emergency care doctors, but physician acceptance of AI recommendations remains split.
Key Details
- 1Study tested AI-enabled decision-support display ('DecAide') during pediatric trauma simulations with 35 ER care providers from six health systems.
- 2In scenarios with both AI information synthesis and recommendations, correct decisions were made 64.4% of the time, versus 56.3% with synthesis only and 55.8% with no AI support.
- 3Some clinicians accepted AI recommendations only after making their own decisions, while others distrusted or ignored the AI's output.
- 4AI did not slow down decision making; time to decision remained consistent across scenarios.
- 5Concerns about AI recommendations related to physician autonomy, potential bias, and a lack of transparency regarding the AI's reasoning.
- 6Findings were presented at the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, suggesting more research and clarity in AI adoption for emergency care.
Why It Matters

Source
EurekAlert
Related News

AI Tool from UCLA Targets Undiagnosed Alzheimer's and Diagnostic Disparity
UCLA researchers developed an AI model using EHR data to better detect undiagnosed Alzheimer's disease, especially in underrepresented groups.

AI Multimodal Models Improve Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk Prediction
Initial results from an ECOG-ACRIN and Caris Life Sciences collaboration show AI-driven multimodal models can more accurately predict recurrence risk in early-stage breast cancer.

AI Model Improves Differentiation of Brain Tumor Progression from Radiation Necrosis on MRI
A York University-led study shows a novel AI using advanced MRI can distinguish between progressive brain tumors and radiation necrosis more accurately than human assessment.