Back to all news

AI Decision Support Proves Helpful, Yet Contentious, in Emergency Medicine

EurekAlertResearch

Researchers found that AI-driven decision support improved correct decision rates among emergency care doctors, but physician acceptance of AI recommendations remains split.

Key Details

  • 1Study tested AI-enabled decision-support display ('DecAide') during pediatric trauma simulations with 35 ER care providers from six health systems.
  • 2In scenarios with both AI information synthesis and recommendations, correct decisions were made 64.4% of the time, versus 56.3% with synthesis only and 55.8% with no AI support.
  • 3Some clinicians accepted AI recommendations only after making their own decisions, while others distrusted or ignored the AI's output.
  • 4AI did not slow down decision making; time to decision remained consistent across scenarios.
  • 5Concerns about AI recommendations related to physician autonomy, potential bias, and a lack of transparency regarding the AI's reasoning.
  • 6Findings were presented at the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, suggesting more research and clarity in AI adoption for emergency care.

Why It Matters

Although AI support is making inroads in certain fields, its use in time-sensitive clinical workflows like emergency medicine brings distinct challenges. Understanding when, how, and whether clinicians trust and benefit from AI recommendations is crucial for safe and effective integration of such tools in acute care environments and serves as a parallel lesson for radiology-AI system adoption.

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.